IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Anand Pathak, J.
Dhanpal Kewat – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Misc. Criminal Case No. 28698 of 2022
Decided On : 28-06-2022
Bail - M.P. Excise Act - Section 49-A - Sunita Gandharva Vs. State of M.P. - 2020(3) MPLJ(Cri.)247
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under Section 49-A of the M.P. Excise Act. The applicant was arrested for possession of illicit liquor and sought bail on the grounds of no criminal record, willingness to cooperate, and intention to perform community service.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the bail application, emphasizing the spirit of community service and referencing the case of Sunita Gandharva Vs. State of M.P. The court imposed conditions for bail and directed the applicant to submit photographs for monitoring plantation through a mobile application.
Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an offence under Section 49-A of the M.P. Excise Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the applicant's lack of criminal record, willingness to cooperate, and intention to perform community service in granting bail. The court also emphasized the importance of complying with bail conditions and the need for the applicant to submit photographs for monitoring plantation.
Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the court imposed conditions for bail, directing the applicant to submit photographs for monitoring plantation through a mobile application.
JUDGMENT
1. The applicant has filed this FIRST bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 09.05.2022, by Police Station- Indar, District-Shivpuri, in connection with Crime No.101/2022, for the offence punishable under Sections 49-A of the M.P. Excise Act.
2. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant that a false case has been registered against the applicant. Only allegation is in respect of possession of 12 liters illicit liquor and charge-sheet has already been filed. If FSL report ultimately comes against the applicant then applicant is ready to surrender himself. Although it may be hazardous, but in long term, it causes cancer. Charge-sheet has also been filed. Confinement since 09.05.2022 amounts to pretrial detention.
3. Applicant does not bear any criminal record. He learnt the lesson hard way and mend his ways and would become a better citizen. He undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial and would make himself available as and when required. Applicant intends to perform some community service to purge themselves out of the guilt felt by the applicant and to serve national/environmental/social cause. Under these grounds, he prayed for bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the application.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
6. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the facts situation, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed as per the spirit of community service echoed in the order of Sunita Gandharva Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2020(3) MPLJ(Cri.)247. It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
7. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.
7. It is made clear that this bail is granted once the case is made out for bail and thereafter, direction for plantation of saplings is given and it is not the case where a person intends to serve social cause can be given bail without considering the merits.
8. It is directed that in case it is found in the FSL report that the seized liquor was unfit for human consumption, then this order shall automatically stand recalled and the applicant shall surrender before the concerning trial Court immediately and if he does not surrender, then the trial Court shall be at liberty to take him into custody.
The court considered the spirit of community service and the applicant's age in granting bail, subject to strict conditions to ensure compliance and future conduct.
Granting bail based on the nature of the allegation and the spirit of community service.
The court considered the possibility of course correction and the spirit of community service in granting bail to the applicant.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. based on the absence of heinous offences in the applicant's criminal history and the likelihood of a lengthy trial, while imposing specific condi....
The court may grant bail based on the duration of custody and expected trial duration, and may impose specific conditions to ensure the applicant's compliance and cooperation during the trial.
Granting bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C and imposing specific conditions to ensure compliance and cooperation during the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.