SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 192

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Varun – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Omprakash Solanki for applicants; Bhagyashree Gupta, Government Advocate, for State; Kaushal Sisodia for respondent No.2

ORDER

1. This is a petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of Criminal Case No.121/2018 pending before JMFC, Jhabua arising out of Crime No.45/2018 registered at P.s. Jhabua for commission of offence u/s.498-A, 34 of IPC on the ground of compromise between the applicants and the respondent No.2.

2. An application for compounding was filed before the trial Court and the statement was also recorded by the Magistrate but since the offence was non compoundable, and, therefore, compounding was not permitted.

3. Counsel for respondent No.2 does not dispute the said fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties.

4. In view of the above, it would be apposite to survey the law in respect of compounding in non-compoundable case. The apex Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 after considering the the provisions of section 320 and 482 of the Cr.P.C held that the compounding can he permitted in a non-compoundable offence.

Relevant part of the order of the order reads as under :--

"Quashing of of ence or criminal proceedings on the ground of settlement between an of ender and victim is not the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top