SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 175

DWARKADHISH BANSAL
Bheru Chandani – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Atul Choudhary for petitioners; Sarang Soni for respondents.

ORDER

1. This civil revision has been preferred by the applicants/defendants 4-5 challenging the order dated 13.4.2022 passed by 3rd Civil Judge Senior Division, Satna in Civil Suit No.17-A/2022 whereby learned trial Court has dismissed the defendants 4-5’s application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants/defendants 4-5 placing reliance on the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Fatehji and Company and another v. L.M Nagpal and others (2015) 8 SCC 390 submits that if from the allegations made in the plaint itself, suit for specific performance is barred by limitation, then the learned Court can reject the plaint under Order 7 rule 11(d) CPC and in the present case agreement in question is said to have been executed on 24.1.2001 but the instant suit appears to have been filed on 3.1.2022, therefore, the same is clearly barred by limitation and it ought to have been rejected under Order 7 rule 11(d) CPC. He submits that without considering this aspect of the matter learned Court below has erred in dismissing the application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent 1/plaintiff by placing reliance on the decision of Supreme Court in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top