Back
G. S. AHLUWALIA
Shanti Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard on I.A.No.1950/2023, an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC.
2. This application has been filed by Laxmi Naryan Dangi seeking his impleadment as respondent on the ground that he is in possession of the land in dispute for the last 40 years.
3. The application at this stage is not maintainable as he neither applied before the Trial court nor before the First Appellate Court for his impleadment.
4. Furthermore the question in the present case is as to whether the acquisition of the land was completed or not?
5. Accordingly, I.A.No.1950/2023 is hereby rejected.
6. Heard on admission.
7. This second appeal, under section 100 of CPC, has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.8.2014 passed by 16th Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Appeal No.93/2013, arising out of judgment and decree dated 7.2.2013 passed by Second Additional Civil Judge, Class-I to the Court of First Civil Judge, Class-I, Bhopal in RCS No.1423-A/2012.
8. The facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal in short, are that the plaintiffs/appellants filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. It is the case of the plaintiffs that Khasra No.16/2, area 1.28 h
The court ruled that actual physical possession must be established for the State to validly claim ownership under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, and procedural requirements for n....
Proceedings issued under the Urban Land Ceiling Act against a deceased declarant are null and void; possession must be established prior to claiming surplus land.
The court held that a writ petition challenging a notice after 26 years is time-barred, as prior proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act had attained finality.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 10(5) and 10(6) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, and the validity of exemption applications under Section 21.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State must establish the voluntary surrender of vacant land or forceable dispossession under the ULC Act. Failure to do so entitles the la....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
