Back
VISHAL MISHRA
KASHIBAI – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH PARASHAR – Respondent
ORDER/JUDGMENT – Shri D. D. Bansal with Shri Sarvesh Sharma, counsel for the petitioners.
Shri N. K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sanjay Sharma Advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 2.
2. With the consent of parties, the matter is finally heard.
3. Present petition is being filed for recalling the order dated 19-6-2019 passed by Additional Collector, District Bhind whereby, the revision filed by the petitioners has been rejected.
4. It is alleged by counsel for the petitioners that Mevaram, Rajendra, Bhagirth, Jagdish and Udayveer are all family members and they jointly filed an application under section 178 of M.P. Land Revenue Code before Tahsildar seeking partition of the property in question. The learned Tahsildar after recording statements of the parties and after preparation of FARD allowed the application and passed the order of partition of the property dated 18-2-2014 on the consent of the parties. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents with mala fide intention preferred an appeal under section 44 of MPLRC before the Court of SDO Bhind on 20-1-2016 along with an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act which was allowed by learned SDO without a
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
