High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Mohammad Rafiq, C. J., Atul Sreedharan, J.
IN REFERENCE (SUO MOTU) - APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF M. P. & ORS. - RESPONDENTS
W. P. No. 9320 of 2021
Decided On : 10-05-2021
COVID-19 - Prisoners' Rights - Prisoners Act, 1900, Section 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 31-D, 31-E - The court discussed the provisions of the Prisoners Act, 1900, particularly sections 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 31-D, and 31-E, which provide for the grant of leave and emergency leave to prisoners. The court also highlighted the guidelines issued by the World Health Organization and the orders of the Supreme Court regarding the release of prisoners to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in prisons.
Fact of the Case:
The court addressed the overcrowding of prisons in Madhya Pradesh due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to decongest them to prevent the spread of the virus among prisoners.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the overcrowding of prisons posed a significant risk to the health of prisoners and emphasized the need to relax the criteria for granting parole and temporary bail to reduce the prison population.
Issues: The main issue before the court was the overcrowding of prisons in Madhya Pradesh and the measures to be taken to decongest them in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to direct the authorities to consider granting emergent parole to specific categories of prisoners, subject all prisoners to regular testing, and implement other measures to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the prison population.
Final Decision: The court directed the authorities to consider granting emergent parole to specific categories of prisoners, subject all prisoners to regular testing, and implement other measures to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the prison population. The matter was listed for further consideration on 17-5-2021.
ORDER/JUDGMENT MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, C. J. : – Mr. Sankalp Kochar, Advocate appeared as Amicus Curiae.
Mr. Pushpendra Yadav, Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State along with Mr. Arvind Kumar,
Director General of Prisons and Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Deputy Inspector General of Jails.
Mrs. Giribala Singh, Member Secretary, M. P. State Legal Services Authority, Jabalpur.
Proceedings in this suo motu writ petition were initiated on 7-5-2021 in view of unprecedented situation faced by the country following second wave of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Coronavirus has engulfed the whole of the Madhya Pradesh and has spread across the width and length of the entire State. No segment of the society has remained untouched. Though not very alarming but reports about prisoners, both under-trial and convicted, being found infected with Coronavirus, keep surfacing at regular intervals here and there. Considering that all the Jails in the State are presently housing prisoners almost double the number of their capacity, need of the hour is to immediately decongest them. Urgency of the situation therefore demands passing of appropriate order towards that end.
2. The matter was heard at some length through Video Conferencing. On 7-5-2021, when this suo motu writ petition was registered, but before the detailed order was signed, it was brought to the notice of the Court that the Supreme Court has also taken note of the ongoing situation of Coronavirus in the country and has passed an order on that very day. This matter was therefore ordered to be listed again today.
3. Mr. Sankalp Kochar, learned Amicus Curiae submitted that in the present scenario when the country flounders and is gasping for air in debacle unfurled by the second wave of COVID-19, the state of Madhya Pradesh is amongst those States which are bearing the brunt of it the most. He argued that the capacity of jails in the State of Madhya Pradesh as on 28-2-2021 is 28,675, as against which 49,471 prisoners are lodged therein. Even after releasing 3,700 prisoners on parole, number of prisoners in different jails of the State as on 7-5-2021 is 45,582. Learned Amicus Curiae contended that judiciary being the custodian of liberty of citizens, is duty bound to ensure that those who are in the prison under its authority, are also insulated against the perceptible threat posed by COVID-19 and its ramifications. In his submission, the criteria earlier laid down by the High Powered Committee earlier need to be relaxed further to effectively reduce the overcrowding in the prisons of the State. We cannot agree more with him.
4. The World Health Organization (WHO) in its report titled “Preparedness, Prevention and control of COVID-19 in prisons and other places of detention” with its guidelines dated 8-2-2021 noted that this category of persons are more vulnerable to Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) than the general population because of the confined conditions in which they live together for prolonged periods of time. The Supreme Court in its order dated 16-3-2020, passed in Re: Contagion of Covid-19 Virus in Prisons Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1/2020 acknowledged “a high risk of transmission of COVID-19 to prison inmates”, with prisoners, prison staff, families of prisoners and lawyers entering and leaving jails frequently, and called upon the State Governments and the Union Territories to submit replies on steps being taken by them to prevent the spread of the pandemic among prisoners and juveniles. The Supreme Court in its comprehensive order dated 23-3-2020, suggested that prisoners convicted of or charged with offences involving jail terms of seven years or less could be considered for release on parole or interim bail. The Supreme Court further observed that the State/Union Territory could consider the release of prisoners, who have been convicted or are under-trial for offence
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to relax the criteria for granting parole and temporary bail to reduce the prison population and prevent the spread of COVID-19 among pris....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to relax the criteria for parole and temporary bail to effectively reduce overcrowding in prisons and protect prisoners from the COVID-19 ....
Covid-19 pandemic – Effect on prisoners – Directions issued for Prevention and medical facilities Healthcare system in prisons and measures to be taken for Welfare of inmates in prisons and juveniles....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the extension of interim orders and the authorization of bail applications through e-mail and video-conferencing due to the lockdown restrictions.
The court ruled that the High Powered Review Committee's recommendations regarding prisoner release and Covid-19 protocols are sufficient, emphasizing strict application of Section 436A with exclusio....
(1) Once a person has chosen to approach High Court praying for grant of anticipatory bail, by operation of law, his opportunity to approach Sessions Court gets extinguished.(2) Right to life guarant....
The main legal point established is that the state is responsible for providing medical treatment to prisoners, especially when referral hospitals are dedicated Covid-19 facilities. Additionally, the....
Parole serves to maintain family ties and facilitate rehabilitation; denial must be justified by substantial evidence of risk to public order or security.
Parole – Convicts have right to breathe fresh air for short periods – Any objection raised by local inhabitants/relative cannot be sole determinative basis for refusing parole.
Authorities must conduct comprehensive evaluations of parole applications, considering all relevant factors, especially where favorable reports exist.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.