ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
AJAY KHATEEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
ORDER/JUDGMENT (Heard through Video Conferencing) : – Mrs. Manjit P. S. Chuckal, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Anand Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent /State.
2. The applicant has preferred this petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by order dated 22-3-2021 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in Criminal Revision No. 27/2021, affirming the order dated 8-2-2021 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katni in Criminal Case No. 30/2021, by which application moved by the applicant under section 457 of the Criminal Procedure Code for releasing the vehicle Maruti Suzuki Ertiga VXI bearing registration No. MP-21-CA-3397 on Supurdaginama has been rejected on the ground that there was compliance of section 47-A(3) of the M. P. Excise Act and thus, bar of section 47-D of the M. P. Excise Act is attracted.
3. Brief facts of the case are that on 27-1-2021, acting upon secret information police intercepted Maruti Suzuki Ertiga VXI bearing Registration No. MP-21-CA-3397 and seized 144 bulk liters of country made as well as foreign liquor amounting to Rs. 93,320/- from the said vehicle. Thereafter, police registered Crime No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.