PURUSHAINDRA KAURAV
RANGLAL KUSHWAHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
ORDER/JUDGMENT – Shri Anoop Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Rahul Deshmukh, P. L. for respondents/State. Heard.
2. The petitioner has been superannuated from the post of Naib Tehsildar by order dated 19-5-1995 (Annx.P/1). A criminal case was registered against him and by judgment dated 14-11-2014 passed in Criminal Case No. 1848/1995 by JMFC, he was convicted and sentenced for various offences. Against the said judgment of conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred Cr. A. No. 1205/2014 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal. The learned appellate Court by judgment dated 30-4-2016, allowed the appeal and acquitted him. Against the judgment of acquittal, State of Madhya Pradesh preferred Cr. R. No. 3103/2016 which is stated to be pending before this Court.
3. Since the retiral dues of the petitioner were not being settled, therefore, he filed W. P. No. 9943/2017 which was decided by this Court on 17-11-2017 giving directions to the respondents/authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner. The respondents considered the case of the petitioner and have rejected the same vide Annexure P/6 only on the ground that against the order of acquittal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.