SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
IN REFERENCE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ MISHRA – Respondent
ORDER ANAND PATHAK, J. : – Reference under section 15(2) of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 received by this Court being sent by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Datia in respect of the conduct of respondent.
2. From the contents of reference and the documents/record appended thereto, it appear that a Criminal Case No. 297/2016, State vs. Manoj Sahu and others was going on before the concerned trial Court in which accused were facing charge of offence under sections 452, 294, 323/34 and 506(part II) of Indian Penal Code. On 10-2-2021 case was fixed for prosecution evidence. Complainant as prosecution witness Harimohan Tiwari was present and being examined. Respondent-Pankaj Mishra who is a practicing Advocate at District and Sessions Court, apparently appeared for complainant, although at the time of appearance he did not file Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant nor any application under section 301 of Criminal Procedure Code was filed. It appears from the record/proceedings that prosecution witness Harimohan Tiwari went out from Courtroom for the time being during cross-examination which was taken note of by the trial Court and matter was kept after tea break.
3. After tea break
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.