Back
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Aqib Sohail P S, S/o Sakheer Pb – Appellant
Versus
Raneesh V. R. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner is stated to be an Advocate and says that he visited the Alathur Police Station “to ensure compliance of an order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Alathur” (sic). He asserts that he was abused by the respondents, using denigratory vocatives; thus made to feel very unsafe, being threatened with physical abuse also; and that the entire incident has been video recorded, with a statutorily certified copy placed on record, as Annexure A3. He asserts that the actions of the respondents are in blatant violation of the declaratory directives of this Court in Anil J.S v. State of Kerala and Others [2021 (5) KLT 222], as also Siddique Babu I. and another v. State of Kerala and others [2018 (5) KHC 576]; and thus prays that necessary action against them be initiated and pursued under the Contempt of Courts Act.
2. I am refraining from further inditing the facts involved because, in response to this contempt application, the respondents have filed counter affidavits stating their respective positions, with which this Court will deal presently.
3. Quad hoc the second respondent, his affidavit states that he was on leave on day in question; and that he had,
An apology in contempt proceedings must be genuine and timely; otherwise, it cannot absolve the contemnor of responsibility.
Officials must comply with Court orders; belated apologies in contempt proceedings may indicate insincerity.
Failure to comply with court orders constitutes civil contempt, and an apology offered belatedly may not suffice for exoneration.
The court reinforced the importance of preserving judicial authority and integrity through strict sanctions against criminal contempt.
The main legal point established is that an apology is not a defense to absolve the contemnor from guilt, and the conduct of the contemnor must demonstrate real contriteness to avoid contempt of cour....
The judgment emphasized the importance of wilful disobedience and sincere apologies in contempt cases, highlighting the need for genuine remorse and contrition.
The willful disobedience of a binding precedent by a public authority undermines the rule of law and constitutes contempt of court, warranting penalties to uphold judicial authority.
The selective application of binding precedent by an authority strikes at the root of the administration of justice.
The main legal point established is the importance of dignified behavior, obedience to professional ethics, and the sustenance of the decorum of the institution in the Bar and Bench relationship.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
