ORDER/JUDGMENT : – Shri Ankur Mody, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri Prakash Chandra Chandil, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2.

This appeal under section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed by the appellant (defendant No. 2) being aggrieved of the judgment and decree dated 30-10-2013 passed by the Court of II Additional District Judge, District Morena in Civil Suit No. 17A/2008 titled as Smt. Geeta Bhadoria vs. Jitendra Singh Sikarwar and Smt. Usha Bhadoria whereby, the suit has been decreed for possession against the appellant (defendant No. 2).

2. On perusal of the pleadings, relevant factual matrix of the case is that the respondent/plaintiff herein purchased the suit property vide registered sale deed dated 27-2-2008 from its owner namely Sujan Singh, Shailendra Singh and Surendra Singh sons of Tej Singh. Shailendra Singh is the husband of the present appellant (defendant No. 2). After purchase of the property the present respondent No. 1/plaintiff initially filed a civil suit against the present appellant and proforma respondent No. 2 for eviction under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 on the basis of the default and sub-lettin