Back
RAVI MALIMATH, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
YOGENDRA S/o CHOOTELAL SHRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
(Heard through Video Conferencing) ORDER PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. : – The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by an advertisement dated 20-12-2021 (Annexure P/5) issued by Government Shyam Sunder Agrawal P. G. College, Sihora District Jabalpur inviting applications for appointment on the post of Guest Faculty in Yoga subject under self financing scheme for the academic year 2021-2022.
2. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to the order of appointment dated 20-7-2017 (Annexure P/2) he is working on the post of Guest Faculty in respondent No. 3 College w.e.f 1-8-2017. He placed reliance on various certificates cumulatively marked as Annexure P/3 to demonstrate that he is continuously discharging his duties without there being any complaint and, therefore, the respondents/authorities have committed illegality in issuing an advertisement Annexure P/5. It is stated that if said appointment takes place then his right would be adversely affected. He further states that under similar circumstances, this Court has entertained petitions and directed the Government to continue Guest Faculty teachers till regular appointments are made by the Government.
3. There i
The main legal point established is that the petitioner was not legally appointed as a Guest Faculty in Yoga subject, based on the lack of evidence supporting the appointment claimed.
Temporary appointments do not confer an indefeasible right to continue, but prior case law allows continuation until regular selections are made.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
