SANJAY DWIVEDI
HARSH S/o HARNAM SINGH MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER : – Counsel for the applicant is heard on the question of admission.
2. The applicant has filed this revision under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, questioning the validity of the order dated 22-11-2021 (Annexure A/1) passed by the Sessions Judge, District Bhopal in Sessions Trial No. 974/2021 whereby the charge has been framed against the applicant by the trial Court under sections 294, 333, 353, 307, 302 of Indian Penal Code and under section 25-1(B)(B) of Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance to an FIR lodged on 7-8-2021 (Annexure A/2) offence under sections 294, 333, 353 and 307 of Indian Penal Code got registered against the present applicant. He submits that thereafter the injured died of septicaemia on 20-8-2021. He further submits that as per the facts of the case, after registration of FIR, the injured got hospitalized and was given treatment in Govt. Hospital, i.e. Jai Prakash Govt. Hospital in which the MLC was prepared showing that the complainant/injured had received an incised wound which was opined as simple injury. The injured was later on discharged from hospital on the same day, i.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.