SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 602

High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Vivek Rusia, J.
EVEREST ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. & ANR. – APPELLANTS
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (LEGAL) – RESPONDENT
Cri. Rev. No. 3995 of 2022
Decided On : 30-11-2022

Exceptional circumstances and precedent set by the Apex Court can influence the court's decision in allowing exemption and suspension of jail sentence based on health reasons.

Headnote:

Exemption - Suspension of Jail Sentence - The court allowed the exemption from surrendering before the trial court and suspended the remaining jail sentence of the applicant based on the exceptional circumstance of the applicant's health condition and the precedent set by the Apex Court in the case of Vivek Rai and another vs. High Court of Jharkhand through Registrar General and others.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought exemption from surrendering before the trial court and suspension of the remaining jail sentence based on health reasons, which was opposed by the respondent citing non-fulfillment of conditions under the Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the exemption and suspended the remaining jail sentence based on the applicant's health condition and the precedent set by the Apex Court, directing the appellant to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

Issues: Exemption from surrendering before the trial court and suspension of jail sentence based on health reasons.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the exceptional circumstance of the applicant's health condition and the precedent set by the Apex Court in allowing the exemption and suspension of the remaining jail sentence.

Final Decision: The court allowed the exemption from surrendering before the trial court and suspended the remaining jail sentence, directing the appellant to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

ORDER/JUDGMENT : – Shri Vishal Baheti, learned counsel for the appellant.

    Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent.

      Heard on the question of admission.

        This revision is admitted for final hearing.

        2. Also heard on I. A. No. 13612/2022, which is an application for exemption from surrendering before the trial Court.

        3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Apex Court in the case of Vivek Rai and another vs. High Court of Jharkhand through Registrar General and others, reported in (2015) 12 SCC 86 has held that in an exceptional circumstance, the High Court in exercise of its inherent power can exempt the accused from surrendering, before filing of criminal revision. The applicant is a senior citizen and is not keeping good health. He is suffering from ejection fraction. He was on bail during the trial and pendency of the appeal. He is under constant treatment. Hence, his remaining jail sentence may be suspended.

        4. Shri Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent opposes the application by submitting that the Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules mandates that the application for suspension of sentence should be supported by a certificate of arrest or the order of suspending the jail sentence. The applicant is not fulfilling both the conditions, therefore, no exemption can be granted.

        5. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Vivek Rai and another (supra) and looking to the health conditions of the applicant which is supported by the medical documents, I. A. No. 13612/2022 stands allowed. The applicant is hereby exempted from surrendering before the trial Court. As a consequence, I. A. No. 13613/2022, an application for suspension jail sentence and grant of bail also stands allowed.

        6. The execution of remaining jail sentence of applicant No. 2-Rakesh Garg is hereby suspended and it is ordered that the appellant be released on bail upon his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to depositing the fine amount (if not already deposited) with a further direction to appear before the Registry of this Court on 20-9-2023 and also on such other dates, as may be fixed by the Registry of this Court in this regard during the pendency of this revision.

        7. List for final hearing in due course.

          Certified copy, as per rules.

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top