SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VINAY SARAF
Satish Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Dharmendra Shukla – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri Aditya Khandekar Advocate

ORDER :

VINAY SARAF, J.

The instant criminal revision petition is preferred under Section 397 /401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.296/2024, whereby the conviction of applicant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act has been maintained and the judgment delivered by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur in SCNIA No.1153/18 on 24.9.2024, was upheld.

2. As the applicant is not in custody, I.A. No.8402/2025 was filed for exemption to surrender on behalf of applicant. The applicant has not surrendered before the appellate Court or the trial Court and the present criminal revision petition has been preferred by the applicant, without being in custody.

3. Heard on I.A. No.8402/2025 as well as on the question of maintainability of the revision petition.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no provision under Code of Criminal Procedure to maintain the criminal revision petition against conviction only after surrendering or remaining in jail. He submits that applicant is permanent resident of District Indore and ready to furni

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top