High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J.
KUNCHA s/o BHAGADA BARELA – APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – RESPONDENT
Cri. Revn. No. 4776 of 2022
Decided On : 15-12-2022
Dowry Death - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 304-B of Indian Penal Code - [304-B] - The court discussed the essential ingredients to attract the provisions of section 304-B of Indian Penal Code, emphasizing the requirement of cruelty and harassment in connection with the demand of dowry, the occurrence of death within seven years of marriage, and the establishment of a proximate and live-link between the effect of cruelty based on dowry demand and the concerned death.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a criminal revision against the order framing an additional charge under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code, relating to the death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the deceased died within seven years of her marriage and sought to frame the charge under section 304-B.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of section 304-B, as no allegations regarding demand of dowry were made by the family members of the deceased. The court emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the cruelty and harassment in connection with the demand of dowry, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and discharge the petitioner from the charge under section 304-B.
Issues: The key issue revolved around the applicability of section 304-B of Indian Penal Code and the sufficiency of evidence to support the framing of the additional charge against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the lack of evidence regarding the demand of dowry and the absence of allegations supporting the essential ingredients of section 304-B, as established by relevant case law.
Final Decision: The criminal revision was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was discharged from the charge for the offence under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code.
ORDER : – This criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code is filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 2-12-2022 passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Barwani, district Barwani in S. T. No. 131/2019 by which the learned Judge has framed additional charge against the petitioner for offence under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code.
2. The brief facts of the case is that on 3-10-2019 a merg intimation was registered at Police Station Palsood by the complainant Doorsingh alleging that on 1-10-2019 after having dinner he and all his family members had gone to sleep at around 9:30 P.M. in their respective rooms. When Singabai, wife of the complainant got up she saw that Mamta was not present on her cot. A search was carried out for Mamta but the same was in vain. It was also informed by the complainant that Santribai the first wife of the petitioner was from Badara Faliya and when she had gone to Gujarat for livelihood along with her father, the petitioner married Mamta and she is nine months pregnant. It was further alleged that when the brother of the complainant took his goats for grazing in the agricultural field, he saw the dead body of Mamta lying in the well.
3. On the said intimation, Merg was registered and an inquiry was carried out. The body of Mamta was taken out from the well and sent for postmortem. Statements of the family members of the deceased were recorded and they all stated that the petitioner was not treating his wife Mamta properly and as a consequence, she committed suicide. Based on the said allegations, FIR was registered at police station Palsood for an offence under section 498-A, 306 of Indian Penal Code at Crime No. 231/2019. The said charges were denied by the petitioner.
4. Thereafter, on 25-11-2022 an application was filed by the prosecution stating that the deceased had died within seven years of her marriage, and therefore, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barwani framed charge under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code against the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned trial Court has erred by not appreciating the fact that assuming the allegations of the prosecution story to be true which has come in the charge-sheet and the Court statements of the family members of the deceased, nowhere any of he witnesses have stated that the petitioner has demanded any dowry from the deceased or from her family members. Nowhere it has come that soon before the death the deceased was harassed by the petitioner for dowry. These are basic and mandatory requirements of section 304-B of Indian Penal Code and in absence of the same, no charge under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code is made out against the applicant.
6. The learned trial Court has erred by not appreciating the fact that the application dated 25-11-2022 which has been filed by the prosecution to additionally frame a charge against the applicant for an offence under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code, no reason has been assigned as to why the said charge should be framed except that the deceased had died within the seven years of her marriage. Hence, prays that this revision be allowed and the impugned order framing charge under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code be set aside.
7. Learned counsel for the State has supported the order impugned and prays for dismissal of this revision.
8. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the record.
9. It is pertinent to reproduce the provisions of section 304-B of Indian Penal Code which reads as under : –
304-B. Dowry death. – (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, such death sh
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to establish cruelty and harassment in connection with the demand of dowry, the occurrence of death within seven years of marria....
The prosecution must establish all essential ingredients of Section 304B IPC for a conviction; failure to prove any ingredient negates the possibility of guilt.
Conviction under Section 304B set aside due to lack of evidence for dowry demand; conviction under Section 302 upheld based on established homicide.
At the charge framing stage, continuous demand for dowry and the existence of cruelty must be demonstrated, allowing for the presumption of guilt under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC.
Prosecution must establish all ingredients of Section 304(B) IPC for conviction; failure to prove demand for dowry soon before death results in acquittal.
The prosecution must prove the necessary ingredients for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC, including evidence of cruelty or harassment related to dowry demand, to justify altering charges.
The definition of 'soon before' in dowry death cases requires a broader interpretation, emphasizing proximity and cumulative effects of sustained abuse over immediate factors.
The prosecution must prove all three ingredients of Section 304B IPC for conviction; failure to establish demand for dowry and torture led to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.