SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 271

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Dheeraj @ Dhiru @ Dhuri @ Shahrukh @ Salman – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Neeraj Dubey for petitioner; Suyash Thakur, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-

"a. To issue a writ in the of habeas corpus commanding respondents, to release the petitioner forthwith, since he has already undergone the sentence awarded to him.

b. To call for the relevant records, for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

c. Any other relief's deemed fit on facts and circumstances of the instant case."

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he was convicted for the offence punishable under section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 in Special Case No.129 of 2016 by the judgment dated 18.1.2019 and sentenced for a period of 3 years R.I. with fine of Rs.1,000/- and 3 years R.I. with fine of Rs.1,000/- respectively. The same was challenged by filing Criminal Appeal No.1670 of 2019. Thereafter by the order dated 24.1.2022 the appeal was dismissed as not pressed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was dismissed as not pressed since according to the petitioner he has already undergone the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top