Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE, ABASAHEB D.SHINDE
Kailas Shankar Navekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, heard finally at the admission stage.
2. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has put forth the following prayers :
“A. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent-authorities to treat the sentences awarded to the petitioner in (i) Sessions Case No. 100/2006, Additional Sessions Judge, Beed and (ii) Sessions Case No. 04/2007 (now confirmed in Criminal Appeal No. 672/2008), as running concurrently in terms of Section 427(2) Cr.P.C. and to give consequential benefits thereto.
B. Direct the respondent-State and the Competent Authority to forthwith decide the petitioner's pending proposal/representation seeking concurrency of sentences and premature release, strictly in accordance with law and within a time-bound period as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
C. Direct the respondent-authorities to recalculate the petitioner's sentence by applying Section 427(2) Cr.P.C. and upon such recalculation, if the petitioner is found to have undergone the requisite period of imprison
Prior term sentences must be served before subsequent life sentence under Section 427(1) CrPC unless court directs concurrency; Section 427(2) applies only when prior sentence is life imprisonment.
The court clarified that unless explicitly ordered, sentences from multiple convictions run consecutively under Section 427 of Cr.P.C., accommodating set-off for time served, emphasizing the legislat....
Defiance of Parole order – When a sentence of imprisonment for a term is passed under the Code on an escaped convict, Section 426(2)(a) Cr.P.C., is applicable and Court has to take note of explicit p....
The High Court has the authority to direct sentences from separate convictions to run concurrently under Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ensuring fair treatment in sentencing.
The court may direct sentences to run concurrently under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., considering the nature of offenses and the defendant's likelihood of reform.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretionary powers of the criminal courts in applying Section 427 Cr.P.C. and determining the concurrent running of sentences in multiple cas....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
