IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Rusia, J.
Rajan & Another v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Another
Miscellaneous Criminal Cases No. 35596 of 2018 and 16764 of 2019 (Indore); Decided on 17.8.2023
(1) Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 482 -- Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 498A, 323 and 34 -- quashing of FIR -- except oral evidence, nothing on record to corroborate statement of complainant to establish charge of S. 498A -- delay of one year in lodging FIR -- no explanation -- only oral allegation about assault -- no MLC on record – allegation of demand of dowry and car general in nature -- husband and wife have settled in Australia -- complainant has given Power of Attorney to her father to contest case against these applicants – this is now a case of reverse cruelty upon them -- FIR quashed. (2014) 8 SCC 273, (2010) 7 SCC 667, (2012) 10 SCC 741 and (2018) 14 SCC 452 followed. 2013 (2) Kar. L.J. 194, AIR 1997 SC 768, 2017 CrLJ (NOC 746) 233, M. Cr. C. No. 1825 of 2011 decided on 15.3.2016 (Gwalior Bench), 2017 SCC Online Pat. 2771, W.P. (Cr.) No. 588 of 2011 decided on 4.9.2013 (Delhi), 2013 SCC Online 13771, AIR 2016 SC 1871, (1996) 8 SCC 164, 1995 CrLJ 2935 and 1997 CrLJ 3221 referred to. [Paras 7 to 9, 17 & 18]
(2) Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 482 -- Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 498A, 323 and 34 -- quashing of FIR -- jurisdiction -- only marriage solemnized at Indore -- complainant gave address of Indore but no material to support that she or her father are ordinary residents of Indore -- no offence said to have been committed in Indore -- applicants permanent residents of Gurgaon -- parents of complainant permanent residents of Navi Mumbai -- entire allegation about demand of dowry and commission of atrocities in matrimonial house at Gurgaon -- FIR at Indore wrongly registered. [Para 8]
¼1½ naM ÁfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 482 & naM lafgrk] 1860 & /kkjk 498d] 323 rFkk 34 & ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ dk vfHk[kaMu & ekSf[kd lk{; ds flok;] /kkjk 498d dk vkjksi fl) djus gsrq f'kdk;rdrkZ ds dFku dh laiqf"V djus ds fy, vfHkys[k ij dqN ugha & ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ nkf[ky djus esa ,d o"kZ dk foyac & dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha & geys ds ckjs esa dsoy ekSf[kd vfHkdFku & vfHkys[k ij dksbZ fpfdRlk fof/kd Áek.ki= ugha & ngst vkSj dkj dh ekax dk vfHkdFku lkfoZd ÁÑfr dk & ifr vkSj iRuh vkWLVªsfy;k esa cl x, gSa & f'kdk;rdrkZ us bu vkosndx.k ds fo#) Ádj.k yM+us ds fy, vius firk dks eq[rkjukek fn;k gS & vc ;g bu ij iyVokj Øwjrk dk ekeyk gS & ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ vfHk[kafMrA ¼2014½ 8 ,l lh lh 273] ¼2010½ 7 ,l lh lh 667] ¼2012½ 10 ,l lh lh 741 rFkk ¼2018½ 14 ,l lh lh 452 vuqlfjrA 2013 ¼2½ dukZVd ,y ts 194] , vkb vkj 1997 ,l lh lh 768] 2017 lhvkj ,y ts ¼,u vks lh 746½ 233] Ádh.kZ nkafMd ekeyk Øekad 1825 lu~ 2011 fu.khZr fnukad 15-3-2016 ¼Xokfy;j [kaMihB½] 2017 ,l lh lh vkWuykbu iVuk 2771] fjV ;kfpdk ¼nkafMd½ Øekad 588 lu~ 2011 fu.khZr fnukad 4-9-2013 ¼fnYyh½] 2013 ,l lh lh vkWuykbu 13771] , vkb vkj 2016 ,l lh 1871] ¼1996½ 8 ,l lh lh 164] 1995 lhvkj ,y ts 2935 rFkk 1997 lhvkj ,y ts 3221 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 7 ls 9] 17 ,oa 18½
¼2½ naM ÁfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 482 & naM lafgrk] 1860 & /kkjk 498d] 323 rFkk 34 & ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ dk vfHk[kaMu & vf/kdkfjrk & bankSj esa dsoy fookg vuq"Bkfir & f'kdk;rdrkZ us bankSj dk irk fn;k ijarq blds leFkZu esa dksbZ lkexzh ugha fd og ;k mlds firk bankSj ds lkekU; fuoklh gSa & bankSj esa fdlh vijk/k dk fd;k tkuk dfFkr ugha & vkosndx.k xqM+xkao ds LFkk;h fuoklh & f'kdk;rdrkZ ds ekrk&firk uch eqacbZ ds LFkk;h fuoklh & ngst dh ekax vkSj vR;kpkj fd, tkus dk laiw.kZ vfHkdFku xqM+xkao ds nkEiR;x`g esa & bankSj esa ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ xyr jftLVªhÑrA ¼iSjk 8½
ORDER
1. The applicants have filed these petitions u/s. 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of FIR No.139/2018 registered on a complaint made by respondent No.2 alleging commission of offence u/s. 498-A, 323 and 34 of the IPC at Police Station Mahila Thana, Indore. The petitioner in M.Cr.C. No.16764/2019 has also sought quashment of the proceedings in Cr. Case No. 878/2019.
The introduction of the parties
2. Applicant No.1 is the father of Kartik Mathur R/o G-39, South City 2, Gurgaon (now Gurugram) and Apllicant No. 2 is the wife of Daksh Mathur (the elder son of Apllicant No.1) . Smt. Meera Mathur is the wife of applicant No. 1. The applicants are residents of H. NO. 123, BLOCK A-9, ROAD NO. 1, SHYAM KUNJ, NEAR MARUTI KUNJ, GURGAON (HARYANA). Respondent No. 2 / the complainant is a daughter of SHRI SARVESH MATHUR R/O B 503, CRYSTAL COURT, CHS, SECTOR 7, KHARGHAR, NAVI MUMBAI. Respondent No.2 and Kartik Mathur ( younger son of Applicant No.1) were married following Hindu rites and rituals in Indore on 22.6.2017.
The prosecution story
2. Respondent No.2, lodged an FIR on 29.7.2018 at Police Station Mahila Thana Indore disclosing that at the time of marriage, her parents spent Rs. 50 to 60 Lacs and they also gave gold and silver ornaments to the applicants. Her husband Kartik Mathur and his parents demanded Rs.1,00,000/- for the arrangement of an AC bus, at the time of marriage which her father had given. She went to her matrimonial house in Gurgaon. Thereafter she went with her husband to Shimla for a honeymoon. Parents of Kartik Mathur i.e. Rajan Mathur and Smt. Meera Mathur and Smt. Nandita Mathur W/o. Daksh Mathur also reached Shimla to spoil the honeymoon. the complainant further alleges that they all ill-treated by way of taunting her for the demand of Rs.10 Lacs and a car. Thereafter, they all came back to Gurgaon. On 30.6.2017, Kartik Mathur left for Australia disclosing that he is unhappy with her as her parents did not fulfil the demand. She remained with her in-laws in the matrimonial house for a few days. She was beaten and thrown out of the house on 30.7.2017. Thereafter, she came to Indore and lodged the FIR on 29.7.2018 i.e. after one year. The contents of the FIR are as under:
^^eSa mfuŒ laxhrk ckfj;k efgyk Fkkuk bankSj ij inLFk gwaA vkt fnukad dks Qfj;kfn;k iYyoh ifr dkfrZd ekFkqj mez 30 lky fuŒ th 39 lkÅFk flVh ikVZ 2] xqMxkao gky fuoklh 35 ukud iSysl dkWyksuh fiiY;kjkÅ bankSj }kjk ,d ys[kh vkosnu ÁLrqr fd;k ftl ij ls vijk/k /kkjk 498,] 323] 34 Hkknfo dk ik;k tkus ls vijk/k iathc) dj foospuk esa fy;k tkrk gS udy vkosnu fuEukuqlkj gS Áfr] Jheku Fkkuk ÁHkkjh egksn; efgyk Fkkuk bankSj fo"k; ifr] lkl] llqj] tsBkuh }kjk ngst esa 10 yk[k :i;s o dkj dh ekax dj ÁrkfM+r djus ckor~A egksn;] fuosnu gS fd eSa ÁkFkhZ iYyoh ifr dkfrZd ekFkqj mez 30 lky fuŒ th 39 lkÅFk flVh ikVZ 2] xqMxkao gky fuoklh 35 ukud iSysl dkWyksuh fiiY;kjkÅ bankSj dh jgus okyh gaw esjh 'kknh fnukad 22-6-2017 dks dkfrZd firk jktu ekFkqj fuŒ th 39 lkÅFk flVh ikVZ 2 xqMxkao ds lkFk nksuksa ifjokjksa dh jkthethZ ls l;kth gksVy bankSj esa gqbZ Fkh 'kknh esa esjs ekrk firk us djhc 50&60 yk[k :i;s [kpZ fd;s Fks o lksus pkanh ds jde nh Fkh o fonkbZ ds le; llqjky tkus ds fy;s esjs ifr] lkl] llqj] tsBkuh us ,d yk[k :i;s ,ŒlhŒ cl ds fy;s ekax dh o dgk fd 10 yk[k :i;s o dkj Hkh gesa ngst esa pkfg;s] rks fQj esjs ekrk firk us 01 yk[k :i;s rqjar cl esa tkus ds fy;s fn;s mlds ckn esa llqjky xqMxkao pyh x;h ogka ls rhu fnu ckn gh esjs ifr vkSj eSa guhewu ds fy;s f'keyk x;s rks ogka ij esjs lkl] llqj] tsBkuh Hkh vk x;s ogka ij Hkh esjs ifr] lkl] llqj] tsBkuh us esjs lkFk vPNk O;ogkj ugha fd;k vkSj fQj ge lHkh xqMxkao vk x;s fQj fnukad 30-6-2017 dks esjs ifr vkLVªsfy;k pys x;s vkSj tkrs le; cksys fd eSa rqels ukjkt gwa rqEgkjs ekrk firk us ngst esa 10 yk[k :i;s o dkj ugha nh gS fQj mlds ckn eSa llqjky esa gh jgh bl nkSjku esjs lkFk esjs lkl] llqj] tsBkuh us ngst dh ckr dks ysdj rkukdlh djrs vkSj dgrs fd rsjs ek;ds ls ngst esa 10 yk[k :i;s o dkj ysdj vk;k blh ckr dks ys
Specific allegations are essential to establish a prima facie case under IPC Sections 406 and 498-A; general allegations are insufficient for prosecution.
The efficacy of dowry harassment claims requires specific allegations; generic accusations against relatives may lead to quashing of charges.
Vague and general allegations in matrimonial disputes do not warrant prosecution under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, as they may constitute malicious prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.