SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 247

ANURADHA SHUKLA
Nirmala Verma – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Verma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Dharmendra Kaurav for petitioner; None for respondent.

ORDER

1. In this Criminal revision filed under section 397 of Cr.P.C. the petitioners have challenged the order passed on 19.7.2013 by First Additional Principal Judge Bhopal in M.J.C. No.166/2011, whereby the maintenance application of petitioner No.1 was rejected and maintenance of Rs.1,000/- was allowed in favour of petitioner No.2, which is on the lower side.

2. Facts pleaded by the petitioners in application under section 125 of Cr.P.C. filed before the concerned family Court are that petitioner No.1 is a legally wedded wife and petitioner No.2 is the daughter of respondent. Three or four months after the marriage that was solemnized on 11.7.2008, the respondent started harassing the petitioner No.1 for demand of Rs.1 Lakh in dowry and also caused aspersion on her character. She was also harassed by the mother and sister of the respondent for the similar demand. After the birth of petitioner No.2 on 15.5.2009, respondent took both the petitioners to the parental house of petitioner no.1 and told her not to come back unless the demand of Rs.1 Lakh was fulfilled. Since then both the petitioners are being neglected by the respondent, who has not taken care of any of their needs. Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top