ANURADHA SHUKLA
Nirmala Verma – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Verma – Respondent
ORDER
1. In this Criminal revision filed under section 397 of Cr.P.C. the petitioners have challenged the order passed on 19.7.2013 by First Additional Principal Judge Bhopal in M.J.C. No.166/2011, whereby the maintenance application of petitioner No.1 was rejected and maintenance of Rs.1,000/- was allowed in favour of petitioner No.2, which is on the lower side.
2. Facts pleaded by the petitioners in application under section 125 of Cr.P.C. filed before the concerned family Court are that petitioner No.1 is a legally wedded wife and petitioner No.2 is the daughter of respondent. Three or four months after the marriage that was solemnized on 11.7.2008, the respondent started harassing the petitioner No.1 for demand of Rs.1 Lakh in dowry and also caused aspersion on her character. She was also harassed by the mother and sister of the respondent for the similar demand. After the birth of petitioner No.2 on 15.5.2009, respondent took both the petitioners to the parental house of petitioner no.1 and told her not to come back unless the demand of Rs.1 Lakh was fulfilled. Since then both the petitioners are being neglected by the respondent, who has not taken care of any of their needs. Re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.