PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Rajkumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Sarika – Respondent
ORDER
1. This criminal revision has been filed by the petitioner under section 19(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 being crestfallen by the order dated 7.1.2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in M.J.C. No. 813/2017, whereby the learned Family Court has awarded the maintenance of Rs.27,000/- in favour of respondent/Sarika from the date of order i.e. 7.1.2020.
2. The facts in brief are that the marriage was solemnized between petitioner and respondent on 13.7.2013. Before this marriage, the respondent No. 1 had been married with one Manish Gupta at Khargone. Manish Gupta was a government servant. When respondent No. 1 got pregnant and told her husband Manish Gupta, he disclosed that he has already married, his wife name is Naveena Sutar, so the marriage between them is illicit. The respondent No. 1 gave birth a son namely Prakhar/respondent No. 2. Her husband Manish Gupta abandoned her saying that “nothing is remained to be continued between us, I took marriage with her with my interest”. Meanwhile, brother of the respondent No. 1, uploaded information regarding respondent No. 1/wife and respondent No. 2/Son on internet.
3. On that information,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.