SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 389

PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Rajkumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Sarika – Respondent


Advocates:
Mahesh Agrawal for applicant;
Kamlesh Kumar Guru for respondents.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision has been filed by the petitioner under section 19(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 being crestfallen by the order dated 7.1.2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in M.J.C. No. 813/2017, whereby the learned Family Court has awarded the maintenance of Rs.27,000/- in favour of respondent/Sarika from the date of order i.e. 7.1.2020.

2. The facts in brief are that the marriage was solemnized between petitioner and respondent on 13.7.2013. Before this marriage, the respondent No. 1 had been married with one Manish Gupta at Khargone. Manish Gupta was a government servant. When respondent No. 1 got pregnant and told her husband Manish Gupta, he disclosed that he has already married, his wife name is Naveena Sutar, so the marriage between them is illicit. The respondent No. 1 gave birth a son namely Prakhar/respondent No. 2. Her husband Manish Gupta abandoned her saying that “nothing is remained to be continued between us, I took marriage with her with my interest”. Meanwhile, brother of the respondent No. 1, uploaded information regarding respondent No. 1/wife and respondent No. 2/Son on internet.

3. On that information,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top