SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 391

VIVEK RUSIA
Arvind – Appellant
Versus
Secretary Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
L. R. Bhatnagar for petitioner; Sudhanshu Vyas, Panel Lawyer for respondents No. 2 and 3.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 15.4.2008, whereby he has been dismissed from service w.e.f. 15.4.2008 (AN) and his unauthorized absence period from 14.4.2007 to 15.4.2008 total 372 days has been treated as 'Dies Non' for all purpose. This petition is also against the order dated 11.8.2009, whereby the appellate authority has dismissed the appeal maintaining the order of dismissal from service. The petitioner is also challenging the order dated 11.2.2010, whereby the Director General of Police has dismissed the revision.

2. Facts of the case in short are as under:-

2.1. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Village – Tok, Post Office – Amilkoni, District – Rewa. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable in Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) in the year 2007 and he was posted in 156 Battalion. He was sanctioned with earned leave w.e.f. 9.2.2007 to 9.4.2007. He was required to report to the office back on 10.4.2007 but he did not report to the duty. The Chief Judicial Magistrate issued an arrest warrant on 18.6.2007 through Superintendent of Police, Rewa but the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top