SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 358

PRANAY VERMA
Anjali Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
Chief Election and Returning Officer Nagar Parishad Election 2022-23, – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Ishita Agrawal for petitioner;

ORDER

1. This revision under section 26 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1961”) has been preferred against the order dated 13.7.2023 passed by First Additional District Judge, Sardarpur, District Dhar in MJC (EP) No.27/2023 whereby the election petition preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed as barred by time holding that provisions of section 5 read with section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 are not applicable to an election petition under section 20 of the Act, 1961. The election petition was preferred by the petitioner calling in question election of respondent No.4 to the seat of President of Municipal Council, Nagar Parishad, Rajgarh, District Dhar.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Court below has erred in dismissing the election petition as barred by time by holding that provisions of section 5 read with section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 are not applicable to an election petition filed under the Act, 1961. On the contrary, the said provisions are very much applicable and ought to have been given due effect to and the delay in filing the election petition ought to have been condone

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top