SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1240

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nandita Dubey, J.
Aman @ Rishi Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 61709 of 2021
Decided On : 26-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
D.D. Bhave, Advocate, Yogendra Das Yadav, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Grant of anticipatory bail based on the absence of criminal antecedents, the applicant's background, and the undertaking to not pressurize the prosecutrix or witnesses.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Rape Allegation - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. based on the undertaking that the applicant would not force or pressurize the prosecutrix or any witnesses, cooperate in the investigation, and comply with specified conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application apprehending arrest in connection with a rape case. The complainant alleged that the applicant raped her and refused to marry her.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, directing the release of the applicant on furnishing a personal bond and solvent surety, subject to specified conditions.

Issues: Alleged false implication, lack of criminal antecedents, and the applicant's career and background were considered.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the absence of criminal antecedents, the applicant's background, and the undertaking to not pressurize the prosecutrix or witnesses as key factors in granting anticipatory bail.

Final Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, subject to specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Nandita Dubey, J. - This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. T h e applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.437/2022 registered at Police Station Madanmahal, District Jabalpur for the offences mentioned therein.

3. A s per prosecution, the complainant/prosecutrix filed a complaint on 08.12.2022 that she knew the applicant for over more than a year. The applicant has proposed marriage to her. However, she stated that she can only do so, if her family members agree. It is stated that the applicant took her to his house on the pretext that he is not feeling well and has committed rape on her on 03.07.2022. When the prosecutrix asked him to marry her, the same was refused.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. The prosecutrix/complainant has been pressurizing the applicant to marry her to which he has refused, hence false case of rape has been filed by her. It is stated that the prosecutrix is a major person. The applicant has totally denied the case. It is stated that no such act has been committed by him. It is further pointed out that he has completed Engineering and has been appointed as an Intern in the WIPRO Limited (Company/WIPRO). Under such circumstances, he would not even think of committing any such act that would jeopardize his career. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application. However, he fairly submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant.

6. Under such circumstances, on the undertaking that the applicant would not force or pressurize the prosecutrix or any of the witnesses during the trial and he would also cooperate in the investigation and remain present before the police station as and when he is called for recording his statements or otherwise.

7. Considering the aforesaid, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One lakh only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer.

8. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

    2 . The applicant will make himself available as and when called for interrogation and cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during trial;

    5. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and

    6. If the applicant commit any offence while being on anticipatory bail, then this order shall automatically stand cancelled without reference to the Court.

    Certified copy as per rules.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top