SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Pradeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 28856 of 2022
Decided On : 14-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Shraddha Verma, Advocate, Rohit Jain, Advocate
Final Result : Disposed Of

The provision for seeking condonation of delay under Section 64(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 influenced the court's decision.

Headnote:

Condonation of Delay - Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - The court directed the petitioner to file an application under Section 64(2) of the Act for seeking condonation of delay, and the Collector shall decide that application on its own merits.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was aggrieved of an order rejecting a prayer for making a reference under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to file an application under Section 64(2) of the Act for seeking condonation of delay, and the Collector shall decide that application on its own merits.

Issues: Aggrievement of the petitioner, rejection of prayer for making a reference under Section 64 of the Act

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the provision for seeking condonation of delay before the referral authority as contained in Sub-section 2 of Section 64 of the Act, 2013.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the direction to file an application under Section 64(2) of the Act for seeking condonation of delay, and the Collector shall decide that application on its own merits.

JUDGMENT

Vivek Agarwal, J. - Petitioner's contention is that petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 10.10.2022 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Satna in case No.48/B121/2022-23 rejecting a prayer for making a reference under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

2. It is submitted that under similar facts and circumstances, a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.11.2022 in W.P. No.25010/2022 has allowed the petition.

3. Shri Rohit Jain submits that there is a provision for seeking condonation of delay before the referral authority as contained in Sub-section 2 of Section 64 of the Act, 2013.

4. Accordingly, this petition can be disposed of by directing the petitioner to file an application under Section 64(2) of the Act, 2013 and the Collector shall decide that application on its own merits in terms of the order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.11.2022 in W.P. No.25010/2022.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

6. In above terms, petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top