SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 988

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Ramkishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashfaq Khan, Advocate, Kalapana Parmar, Advocate
Final Result : Dismissed

JUDGMENT

Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J. - This criminal revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 26.9.2022 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Datia in Special Case No.41/2022 by which the charges under Sections 294, 148, 452, 450, 324, 323/149, 326/149, 323, 323/149 (six counts), 506 Part - II of IPC have been framed.

2. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicants that the applicants are merely aggrieved by the charge framed by the Trial Court under Section 326 of IPC. By referring to the opinion given by the District Prosecution Officer, Datia, it is submitted by the counsel for the applicants that the offence under Section 326 of IPC was added only on the opinion of District Prosecution Officer which was to the effect that since the complainant has suffered fracture of tibia and fibula bone of left leg which was caused to him by an iron rod and since an iron rod is a dangerous weapon, therefore, prima facie offence under Section 326 of IPC is made out.

3. By referring to the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Prabhu vs. State of M.P. decided on 3.12.2008 in Criminal Appeal No.1956/2008 and judgment passed by the Hig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top