IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Pritish Nandi & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Not Mention Not Mention Not Mention (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 21344 of 2022
Decided On : 22-11-2022
Divorce - Waiving off Cooling Period - Divorce Act, 1869 - Section 10A
Fact of the Case:
The husband and wife, both of Indian domicile and Christians by faith, filed for divorce under section 10-A of the Divorce Act, 1869, seeking to waive off the cooling period. The application was rejected by the Family Court.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur, held that the cooling period of six months under section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, can be waived off in exceptional situations where parties have genuinely settled their differences and there is no possibility of reunion.
Issues: The main issue was whether the cooling period under section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, could be waived off in the case of mutual consent divorce by considering the precedent set by the Supreme Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of the provisions contained in Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869, and the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh case to waive off the cooling period, considering the parties' genuine settlement and no possibility of reunion.
Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Family Court to proceed further in accordance with law, allowing the writ petition.
ORDER
1. The husband and wife have jointly filed an application under section 10-A of the Divorce Act, 1869, before the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur, in Case No.CCB/16/2009.RCSA.91/2022 for waiving off the cooling period, which has been rejected.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the husband and wife are of Indian domicile and are Christians by faith and religion. On 23.7.2018 both of them were lawfully married. Marriage certificate dated 29.8.2018 was issued. Since their marriage was not successful, therefore, they have decided to obtain the decree of divorce by mutual consent. Both of them have decided to seek divorce and to live separately, therefore, it was prayed that pendency of divorce petition may be waived off.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no possibility of compromise between the parties in future.
3. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Amardeep singh Vs. Harveen Kaur, reported in AIR 2017 SC 4417, has considered the question whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under section 13(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1955') for a motion for a passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or directory and whether such period can be relaxed in exceptional situation. The object of the provisions contained in section 13B of the Act of 1955 was considered by the Apex court and it was held as follows :-
"7. In Amardeep Singh (supra), after analysing the provision contained in Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Hon'ble Supreme Court further held as follows:
"18. Applying the above to the present situation, we are of the view that where the Court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out to waive the statutory period under Section 13-B(2), it can do so after considering the following:
i) the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13-B(2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13-B(1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself;
ii) all efforts for mediation/conciliation including efforts in terms of Order XXXIIA, Rule 3, CPC/Section 23(2) of the Act/Section 9 of the Family Courts Act to re-unite the parties have failed and there is no likelihood of success in that direction by any further efforts;
iii) the parties have genuinely settled their O.P.(FC) No.577/2018 differences including alimony, custody of child or any other pending issues between the parties;
iv) the waiting period will only prolong their agony.
19. The waiver application can be filed one week after the first motion giving reasons for the prayer for waiver.
20. If the above conditions are satisfied, the waiver of the waiting period for the second motion will be in the discretion of the concerned Court.
21. Since we are of the view that the period mentioned in Section 13-B(2) is not mandatory but directory, it will be open to the Court to exercise its discretion in the facts and circumstances of each case where there is no possibility of parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation."
9. At this juncture, we find it advantageous to extract here the provisions contained in Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869. Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 reads as follows:
"13B Divorce by mutual consent.- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the District Court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
(2) On the motion of both the parties made
The cooling off period as prescribed under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is not mandatory but directory, and should be waived when there is no possibility of parties resuming cohabi....
The court emphasized that the conditions for waiving the statutory waiting period of six months for divorce under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act are not mandatory, and the court can exercis....
The court established that the statutory period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for a motion for passing a decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory but dir....
The court can waive the statutory waiting period for divorce under Section 13B(2) if the parties mutually agree and conditions for waiver are satisfied.
Waiver of cooling-off period in divorce granted when reconciliation efforts fail and mutual consent is established.
Court may pass decree of divorce on mutual consent where marriage has reached stage of irretrievable break down without resorting to statutory cooling period.
The waiting period for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is not mandatory but directory, and the court can exercise its discretion based on the parties'....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.