DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Dharmendra Travels Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior, in Appeal No.27/2021.
2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner -M/s. Dharmendra Travels Pvt. Ltd. is the owner of eight buses registration number of which has been mentioned in the order dated 23.7.2021 passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Chambal Division, Morena, out of aforesaid eight buses, permit of six buses was granted in favour of the petitioner which is valid from 9.12.2020 to 8.12.2025. Respondent No.3 made a complaint before the competent authority alleging therein that said registration is illegal as it has been obtained on the basis of forged documents. When such complaint was not decided by the competent authority, respondent No.3 approached this Court by filing writ petition No.1262/2021 and this Court vide order dated 28.1.2021 directed competent authority to decide the complaint within a period of four weeks. Thereafter competent authority enquired the matter and prima facie found that there is illegality in the registration of buses. The petitioner in the meanwhile challenged the order dated 28.1.2021 of this Court by filing wr
Adi Pherozshah Gandhi vs. H.M.Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtra
Ghulam Qadir vs. Special Tribunal & Ors.
Jabalpur Transport Development Co. vs. State Transport Appellate Authority
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai vs. Roshan Kumar, Haji Bashir Ahmed & Ors.
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba vs. Tosiba Appliances Company & Ors.
Kanaklata Das and others vs. Naba Kumar Das and others
Maharaj Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. District Collector, Raigad and others
Proper consideration of statutory conditions and vital aspects of permit ownership is crucial in decisions regarding permit cancellation and renewal under the Motor Vehicle Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that allegations of fraud must be supported by evidence and specific allegations, and administrative decisions must be based on valid evidence rath....
The court emphasized the importance of considering relevant evidence and statutory provisions in making decisions, and set aside the impugned order based on these grounds.
The court affirmed that non-communication by authorities regarding permit decisions invalidates claims of automatic cancellation due to inaction, highlighting the Transport Authority's duty to inform....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.