Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Transport – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Mishra, S/o Late Shri Jaiprakash Mishra – Respondent
ORDER :
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.
1. Facts relevant for disposal of the writ petition are that the respondent- Bus Owner/Transporter submitted an application for grant of permit before Regional Transport Authority (RTA) Bastar Region, Jagdalpur for route mentioned therein which falls within the jurisdiction of the RTA Bastar Division Jagdalpur. Application submitted by the respondent-Bus Owner was allowed vide order dated 19.12.2019 with certain conditions. Transporter, as per the condition mentioned in the permit made an application initially on 17.12.2020 for grant of permit pursuant to order passed by the RTA Jagdalpur on 19.12.2019 which was not considered and thereafter again the application was submitted before the RTA, Chhattisgarh, Raipur for issuance of permit on 13.9.2021. When the RTA Raipur did not pass any order, Transporter has approached State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT) by way of filing an appeal. The Appellate Tribunal issued notice to respondent therein and upon hearing the respondent as well as the counsel appearing on behalf of the RTA Chhattisgarh/Department passed orders directing issuance of permit in favour of appellants therein within a period of
The court affirmed that non-communication by authorities regarding permit decisions invalidates claims of automatic cancellation due to inaction, highlighting the Transport Authority's duty to inform....
The obligation of the Authority to issue the physical permit within a reasonable time and the interpretation of 'refusal' under Section 89 of the Act, 1988.
The relevant date for considering applications is the date of consideration, not the date of application. The Court emphasized the need for a liberal approach in condoning delay to ensure substantial....
The court determined that stay orders and interim injunctions must preserve the status quo and adhere to established legal principles, quashing the erroneous orders of the Appellate Authority.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the authority did not have the power to review the timing in the Stage Carriage Permit, as the Act does not confer such power and there was....
The grant of permits to private operators on nationalized routes is prohibited under the scheme framed under Chapter IVA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
The Appellate Board may cancel permits only if necessary to provide relief to appellants while adhering to principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
