SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 825

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J.
Vijay Chandrawanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.22407 of 2022
Decided On : 04-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Pravesh Naveriya, Advocate, K.K. Verma, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court's decision was influenced by the nature of the alleged offences, the length of time the accused has been in custody, and the fact that the alleged offences are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class.

Headnote:

Arms Act - Bail Application - The court allowed the bail application of the accused, considering the circumstances of the case, the fact that the alleged offences are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class, and the length of time the accused has been in custody.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested for the offence punishable under Section 25/27 of arms act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant illegally kept a pistol, which led to the arrest of several co-accused. The applicant claimed innocence and sought bail due to the length of the trial.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, considering the circumstances of the case, the fact that the alleged offences are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class, and the length of time the accused has been in custody.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C, innocence of the applicant, opposition by the State based on the criminal past of the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the circumstances, the nature of the alleged offences, and the length of time the accused has been in custody in allowing the bail application.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to compliance with specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J. - Heard with the aid of case diary.

This is the first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The applicant Vijay Chandrawanshi was arrested on 10/04/2022 in connection with Crime No.249/2022 registered at Police Station amarwara, Distt. Chhindwara (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 25/27 of arms act.

as per the prosecution case, on 10/04/2022, on the information of informant that the applicant Vijay Chandrawanshi has illegally kept one country made pistol, abhishek Pyasi, Sub-Inspector alongwith police force went to the spot and arrested him. On interrogation, he informed the police that co-accused arjun Dehariya gave him one country made pistol and one live cartridge. On that Police arrested co-accused arjun Dehariya, he informed the police that co-accused Vishal Banwari gave that pistol and live cartridge to him and he sold that pistol to co-accused akash Chandrawanshi son of Pannalal Chandrawanshi. On that Police arrested co-accused akash son of Daresh Chandrawanshi & co-accused akash son of Pannalal Chandrawanshi and seized one country made pistol from the possession of co-accused akash son of Daresh Chandrawanshi at his instance and also seized one live cartridge from the possession of co-accused akash son of Pannalal Chandrawanshi.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the offence. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The applicant has been in custody since 10/04/2022 and conclusion of trial will take time, hence it is prayed that the applicant be released on bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submitted that applicant has criminal past, so he should not be released on bail

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, contention of learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that the alleged offences are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class, applicant is in custody since 10/4/2022 and conclusion of the trial will take time, without commenting on merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned CJM/trial Court for his appearance before the trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the trial Court during the pendency of trial.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

    2. The applicant will cooperate in the trial;

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court;

    4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

    5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

    6. The applicant will not leave India without prior permission of the trial Court.

    C.C. on payment of usual charges.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top