SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1625

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.
Balishtar Alias Balkatar Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh Station – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.8121 of 2022
Decided On : 15-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Alok Sharma, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court may grant bail under Section 439 of CrPC based on the completion of investigation, filing of charge-sheet, and the lack of requirement for further custodial interrogation, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439 of CrPC, considering the completion of investigation, filing of charge-sheet, and the lack of requirement for further custodial interrogation. The applicant was directed to comply with various conditions upon release.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of CrPC, stating that he had been falsely implicated and that the trial would take a long time to conclude. The co-accused had already been granted bail, and the applicant had been in custody for almost eight months.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, considering the custody period of the applicant, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the lack of requirement for further custodial interrogation. The court did not comment on the merits of the case but directed the applicant to comply with specific conditions upon release.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 of CrPC, false implication, completion of investigation, filing of charge-sheet, custody period, comparison with co-accused, and compliance with bail conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail based on the completion of investigation, filing of charge-sheet, and the lack of requirement for further custodial interrogation, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and complying with specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - This is first application under Section 439 of CrPC for grant of bail. The applicant has been arrested on 17/6/2021 in connection with Crime No.05/2020 registered at Police Station Sumavali, District Morena for offence under Sections 384, 336, 395, 212, 216, 450 and 398 of IPC, Section 11/13 of MPDVPK act and Section 25/27 of arms act.

It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant Balishtar @ Balkatar Gurjar that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He has not committed any offence. He is in custody since last almost eight months. Now, investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. There is no requirement of further custodial interrogation of the present applicant. Trial will take long time to conclude. It is further submitted that co-accused Karua @ Ramraj Gurjar has already been granted bail by this Court by order dated 23/2/2021 passed in MCRC No.8638/2021 and case of the present applicant is also on the same footings. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposed the bail application and has submitted that case of the present applicant is not on the same footings as of co-accused Karua @ Ramraj Gurjar as present applicant was a member of a dacoit group Gudda Gurjar and he himself has admitted the said fact. Hence, prayed to reject the bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the materials available on record.

It is true that case of the present applicant is not on same footings as of co-accused Karua but considering the custody period of the applicant as well as the fact that now charge-sheet has been filed and there is no requirement of further custodial interrogation, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is hereby directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court for his regular appearance before the court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

    2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicant shall not commit an offence of which he is accused;

    5. The applicant will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

    6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and

    7. The applicant shall mark his presence before the SHO of concerned police station once in a fortnight (every fifteen days) till conclusion of the trial.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top