SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1059

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Ahmed Faiz – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Peyush Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant, Shri A. S. Sisodiya, G.A., for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. They are heard. Perused the case-diary.

2. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he is implicated in connection with Crime No.31/2022 registered at Police Station M. G. Road, Indore District -Indore (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 376, 376(2)(n) & 328 of IPC; Sections 3 & 5 of M.P Freedom of Religion Act and Section 66 (e) of I. T. Act. The applicant is in custody since22.01.2022.

3. The allegation against the applicant is that he committed the rape with the prosecutrix and also posed himself as Hindu, despite being a Muslim and also sent objectionable video clips of the prosecutrix to her fiance, which has led to cancellation of her marriage.

4. The applicant, prior to his arrest was working in a multinational company Accenture at Bangalore. His placement letter is also placed on record. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as he and the prosecutrix were friends since many years as both of them have completed Degree in Law from Government Law College, Dewas and the applicant had also made a transaction of Rs.9,604/- to the Principal of Govt. Law College

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top