SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 991

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vishal Mishra, J.
Mohd Kaleem Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 12732 of 2022
Decided On : 16-03-2022

Advocates Appeared:
M. Shafiqullah, Advocate, Vijendra Choudhary, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, and may impose specific conditions for the grant of bail.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offences under IPC and POCSO Act - The court allowed the bail application, subject to certain conditions, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case without commenting upon the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for offences under Sections 363, 366a, 376 (2) (N), 368, 109 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5/6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences act, 2012. The applicant claimed to be falsely implicated and a first offender.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, subject to verification of the fact that the applicant is a first offender having no criminal history and on furnishing surety bond of Rs.50,000 with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Issues: Bail application for serious offences, false implication, and first offender status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case without commenting upon the merits of the case and granted bail based on the applicant's claim of being falsely implicated and a first offender, subject to certain conditions.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail subject to compliance with specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Vishal Mishra, J. - This is the first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 19.02.2022 by Police Station Burhar, District Shahdol in connection with Crime No.71/2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366a, 376 (2) (N), 368, 109 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5/6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences act, 2012.

It is submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the crime. He has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that there is no allegation of committing rape against the applicant, not even an allegation of helping the present applicant in eloping the girl, who is aged about 17 years 6 months. The other co-accused have already been in custody. The applicant is in custody since 19.02.2022; therefore, there is no further requirement of custodial interrogation of the applicant. The applicant is the first offender. On these grounds, he prays for grant of bail.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application and has prayed for dismissal of the same; however, he could dispute the fact that the applicant is the first offender as per the case diary records.

Considering the over all facts and circumstances of the case without commenting upon the merits of the case, this application is allowed. The applicant be released on bail subject to verification of the fact that the applicant is a first offender having no criminal history and on furnishing surety bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees) Fifty Thousand Only) with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

    2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicant shall not involve any other offence, in case the applicant indulge in any other criminal case the benefit of bail as extended by this Court shall automatically cancelled.

    5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

    6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

    7. If the applicant is found involved in any case except present one, his bail shall stand rejected without any reference to the court;

    8. The applicant will inform the concerned S.H.O. of concerned Police Station about his residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of the Public Prosecutor to send E-copy of this order to SHO of concerned police station as well as Superintendent of Police concerned who shall inform the concerned SHO regarding the same.

    Application stands allowed and stands disposed of.

    Certified copy as per rules.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top