SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 657

DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Ajay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhagirat Singh, Advocate, S. K. Yadav, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J. - This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail relating to FIR No.51/2023 dated 4.3.2023 registered at Police Station Satai District Chhatarpur (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 376(2)(N) of IPC. He is in detention since 16.3.2023.

2. A s per the prosecution story, on 4.3.2023, 20 years old married prosecutrix filed an application in writing alleging that she knew Ajay Sharma for last 4-5 years. One year ago she was married with one Jitendra Yadav. On 30.10.2022 she left home for Bhopal with Ajay, after 2-3 days she came back to her parental home. After two months, she again went with Ajay and stayed with him at Bhopal. Ajay on the false promise of marriage kept her with him but on 8.2.2023 he left her at Bhopal and did not come back. She came back to her parental house. In Bhopal, Ajay had repeatedly committed rape upon her. FIR was registered.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant has not committed any offence. He is innocent. He has been falsely implicated. No sexual intercourse was committed by him on the false promise of marr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top