SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1003

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Surendra Rajak – Appellant
Versus
Shahjahan Begum – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Dwivedi, Advocate, Piyusah Bhatnagar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. - The petitioner in the instant writ petition is challenging the order dated 25.04.2017 (annexure-P-3),passed in Civil Suit No. 97-a/16 by additional Civil Judge, Class-I to the Court of First Civil Judge, Class-1, Rewa (M.P.), whereby, the agreement to sale has been refused to be exhibited.

2. The case of the petitioner/plaintiff is that the respondent No. 1/defendant had executed an agreement to sale with respect to suit property in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff on 30.12.1999 (annexure P-1). The respondent No. 1/defendant sold the suit property to defendant No. 2, therefore, the petitioner-/plaintiff filed a civil suit for declaration of said sale deed dated 29.08.2011 as null and void. During the course of evidence of the plaintiff, the petitioner/plaintiff prayed to exhibit the agreement to sale dated 30.12.1999 which has been refused by the trial Court on the ground that the agreement to sale is insufficiently stamped and is not a registered document, therefore, the petitioner in the instant writ petition. This Court while issuing notice to the respondents on 12.07.2017, stayed the further proceedings of the trial Court and the said or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top