IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.
Balua Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 12105 of 2022
Decided On : 07-03-2022
Bail - Offences under IPC - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed for bail after being arrested for offences under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 294, 323 & 506 of the IPC, involving the use of a firearm.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the bail application, directing the release of the applicant on certain conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail despite the serious nature of the offences and the opposition from the state and the complainant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the arguments and the case diary, and without commenting on the merits of the case, allowed the bail application based on the facts and circumstances.
Final Decision: The application was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to compliance with specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - The applicant has filed this first application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail.
Applicant has been arrested on 08/01/2022 by Police Station City Kotwali, District Morena (M.P.) in connection with Crime No.14/2022 registered for offence under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 294, 323 & 506 of the IPC.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant- Balua Gurjar that the applicant is innocent. He has not committed any offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. applicant is aged around 28 years and is in custody since 08/01/2022 i.e. around two months. It is further submitted that the case is of no injury. False allegations have been made against the present applicant. Investigation and trial will take its own time. The applicant is ready to abide by any condition which may be imposed by this Court in case of grant of bail. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant.
Per contra, learned State counsel as well as counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the application and submitted that the offence is registered under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 294, 323 & 506 of the IPC, wherein firearm was used in the incident. It is further submitted that there is history of three criminal cases against the present applicant and in case of grant of bail to the present applicant, prosecution case would be adversely affected. Hence, prayed to reject this application filed for grant of bail to the applicant.
Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the case diary.
Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant along-with the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned for his regular appearance before the trial Court concerned on the dates fixed by it.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit any kind of offence. In case of commission of any kind of offence, this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled;
5 . The applicant will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.
Application stands disposed of in above terms.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.
Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the nature and gravity of the offence, along with considering the facts & circumstances of the case.
The court may grant bail based on factors such as the status of co-accused and the expected duration of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the nature and gravity of the offence, the arguments presented, and the circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the nature and gravity of the alleged offence, the arguments presented, and the willingness of the applicant to abide by specified conditions.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C based on factors such as lack of criminal history and readiness to abide by specified conditions, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court may grant bail based on the duration of custody and the expected trial duration, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Granting bail based on concerns over alleged false recovery and lengthy trial process under N.D.P.S. act
Granting bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C and imposing specific conditions to ensure compliance and cooperation during the trial.
The court may grant bail based on the duration of custody and expected trial duration, and may impose specific conditions to ensure the applicant's compliance and cooperation during the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.