SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 844

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.
Randheer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.22221 of 2022
Decided On : 04-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Pooran Kulshrestha, Advocate, Purshottam Tanwar, Advocate
Final Result : Disposed Of

The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the nature and gravity of the offence, along with considering the facts & circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Offence under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506/34, 326 of IPC - The court allowed the bail application, imposing stringent conditions on the applicant.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail, stating that he has been falsely implicated in the case and that there has been no progress in the trial.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, considering the arguments advanced by both parties and the facts & circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail in connection with the offence under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506/34, 326 of IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature and gravity of the offence, the arguments of both parties, and the facts & circumstances of the case in allowing the bail application.

Final Decision: The court directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and imposing stringent conditions on the applicant.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - The applicant has filed this second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the applicant.

The applicant has been arrested on 19/11/2021 in connection with Crime No.110/2021 registered at Police Station Maksudangarh, District Guna (M.P.) in relation to the offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506/34, 326 of IPC.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has not committed any offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Earlier co-accused Sonu has been released on bail vide order dated 22/04/2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 15085/2022. There is no progress in the trial and the applicant is in custody since 19/11/2021. Trial will take its own time. applicant is ready to abide by any condition which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, looking to the aforesaid facts of the case, learned counsel prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the application and has submitted that the case is registered against the applicant under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506/34, 326 of IPC, wherein there is sufficent evidence available against the present applicant. Hence, considering the nature and gravity of offence, learned State counsel prayed to reject this application filed for grant of bail to the applicant.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties along with the other facts & circumstances of the case, without commenting on merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac Only) with one solvent surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following stringent conditions by the applicant:-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

    2. The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

    5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

    6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of trial Court/ Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

    This bail application stands disposed of in above terms.

    Let a copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for information.

    Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top