IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Ashok – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 10046 of 2022
Decided On : 28-02-2022
Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the applicant, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), 506 of the I.P.C. and under Section 5L, 6 of the POCSO act 2012, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a second application for grant of bail after being arrested in connection with various offences. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had allured and taken the prosecutrix with him, while the applicant claimed that they were in a love relation and the prosecutrix accompanied him willingly.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the applicant, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the allegations against him and the prolonged pre-trial detention.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the likelihood of the trial not concluding in the near future, the concept of liberty, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case in granting bail to the applicant.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail, subject to compliance with specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Sushrut arvind Dharmadhikari, J. - The applicant has filed this second application u/s 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. First application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 15.12.2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.22388/2021.
The applicant has been arrested by Police Station- Narmada Nagar, District Khandwa, in connection with Crime No.96/2021 registered in relation to the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), 506 of the I.P.C. and under Section 5L, 6 of the POCSO act 2012.
As per the prosecution story, the father of the prosecutrix lodged the report on 08.04.2021 alleging that her daughter was missing and was not found anywhere since 02.04.2021. He has apprehension that the applicant has allured and took his daughter with him. On the basis of the aforesaid, crime has been registered.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He is in custody since 14.04.2021. Charge-sheet has been filed. No further custodial interrogation is required. The applicant and prosecutrix were in love relation with each other. In fact, the prosecutrix accompanied the applicant on her own will. The statement of the prosecutrix, mother and father have been recorded before the trial Court, in which they have turned hostile and not supported the prosecution version. The prosecutrix stated that her father was very cruel and only for the purpose of implicating both of them, FIR has been lodged. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant is a permanent resident of District- Khandwa and there is no likelihood of his absconsion, if he is released on bail. He is ready to abide by the terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court. With the aforesaid submissions, prayer for grant of bail is made.
On the other hand, learned Govt. advocate opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.
However, it would not be desirable to enter into the merits of the rival contentions at this juncture.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to grant the bail to the applicant. accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned Court. The applicant shall also furnish a written undertaking before the concerned Court that he will abide by all the terms and conditions of various circulars, as well as, orders issued by the Central Government, State Government and local administration from time to time such as maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene etc. to avoid proliferation of Corona virus.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;
and
5. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.
6. The applicant shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Bench.
A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.
Certified cop
The court considered the concept of liberty and the prolonged pre-trial detention in granting bail to the applicant.
Point of Law : Court finds that the present is a fit case where the judicial discretion to admit the petitioner on bail, is required to be exercised in his favour.
The court's decision on the bail application was based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, and the conditions imposed for the release of the accu....
The court may grant bail based on the duration of custody and the expected trial duration, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Grant of bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the completion of investigation, lack of necessity for the petitioner's custody, and the petitioner's willingness to comply with bail conditions, consi....
Prolonged pre-trial detention is an anathema to the concept of liberty, and bail can be granted based on the overall facts and circumstances of the case.
Point of Law : 7. Petitioner cannot be kept behind bars for an unlimited period, as investigation is complete and challan stands presented in learned trial Court, fact that petitioner is neither in a....
The court may grant bail based on the period of custody, delay in trial, and without commenting on the merits of the case.
Prolonged pretrial detention as an anathema to the concept of liberty can be a basis for granting bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.