IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Vivek Rusia, Amar Nath (Kesharwani), JJ.
In Re : Special Judge (Electricity Act) No.5, Indore (M.P.) – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2012
Decided On : 26-02-2022
Electricity Act - Offences and Penalties - 135, 139, 151, 153, 154, 155 - The judgment discusses the provisions of the Electricity Act, particularly sections 135, 139, 151, 153, 154, and 155, and their interpretation in the context of trying offences under the Act. It highlights the power of the Special Court to take cognizance of an offence without the accused being committed to it for trial, and the applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the proceedings before the Special Court.
Fact of the Case:
The case involves the registration of a criminal case against the accused for offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Electricity Act. The Special Judge made a reference to the Court regarding legal issues related to filing of single or separate charge-sheets, jurisdiction of the Special Court and Magistrate Court, and the possibility of conflicting verdicts for similar offences committed in the same transaction.
Finding of the Court:
The Court clarified that the Special Court has the power to take cognizance of offences under the Electricity Act and the IPC, and there would be no possibility of facing two trials by the accused for similar offences. It also referred to provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure to support its findings.
Issues: The issues raised in the case include whether the police should file a single charge-sheet or separate charge-sheets for different offences, the jurisdiction of the Special Court and Magistrate Court for similar offences, and the possibility of conflicting verdicts for similar offences committed in the same transaction.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was based on the interpretation of the provisions of the Electricity Act, particularly Section 151 and the applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allowed the Special Court to take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed to it for trial.
Final Decision: The Court answered the reference by clarifying the powers of the Special Court to take cognizance of offences under the Electricity Act and the IPC, and the absence of the need for separate trials for similar offences committed in the same transaction.
JUDGMENT
Vivek Rusia, J. - The present reference is registered u/s. 395 of the Cr.P.C. on a letter dated 2.3.2012 whereby the District & Sessions Judge, Indore has forwarded a request for reference submitted by the Special Judge (Electricity act) No.5, Indore.
The facts of the case which have resulted in sending the present reference to this Court are as under :
Police Station Bhanwarkua, Indore registered Crime No.1025/2011 u/s. 279 and 427 of the IPC and u/s. 139 of the Electricity act, 2003 against accused Raju Chauhan. after investigation, a charge-sheet was filed before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class (JMFC), Indore which was registered as Cr. Case No.28906/2011. Since the offence u/s. 139 of Electricity act,2003 is liable to be tried by a Special Judge appointed under the Electricity act, 2003, therefore, the concerned JMFC has transferred the aforesaid case u/s. 154(2) of Electricity act, 2003 to the Special Court. The Special Judge took the cognizance of the offence only under sec 139 of the Electricity act only in Special Case No. 2007/2012. The Special Judge thought that being additional Session Judge, performing the duties of learned Special Judge, he cannot try the accused u/s. 279 and 427 of the IPC without committal, hence has made the present reference to this Court. Learned Special Judge (Electricity act) has sent the following legal issues by way of this reference :
'(1) should the police file single chargesheet or separate chargesheets (if a single chargesheet is filed whether a special court can take direct cognizance or congizance after committal proceedings);
(2) should the accused be subjected to different jurisdictions (Spl. Court and magistrate court) for same or similar offences committed in the course of same transaction.
(3) how to negate the possibility of conflicting vedict for same or similar offence committed in the course of same transaction.'
*****
Vide order dated 10.7.2018 this Court has appointed Shri S.K. Vyas, and Shri avinash Sirpurkar, Senior advocates and Shri Vivek Singh advocate to assist this Court in the matter.
Chapter XIV of the Electricity act, 2003 deals with the offences and penalties relating to the theft of electricity as defined u/s. 135 of the act. Section 151 provides, no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under this act except upon a complaint in writing made by appropriate Government or appropriate Commission or any of their officers authorised, etc. However, the court may also take cognizance of an offence punishable under this act on a police complaint filed u/s. 173 of the Cr.P.C. Section 153 provides the constitution of special courts. The State Government to provide speedy trial of offences referred to in Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 by notification in the Official Gazette, may constitute as many special courts as may be necessary for such area. as per sub-section (3) of Section 153, a person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of a Special Court unless he was immediately before such appointment, an additional District Judge and Sessions Judge. Section 154 provides the procedure and power of the Special Court to try the offence u/s. 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the Electricity act. Section 155 provides that the provisions of the Cr.P.C. insofar as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Electricity act shall apply to the proceedings before the Special Court. Thereafter, Section 156 provides the remedy of appeal and revision to the High Court against the order passed by the Special Court.
For ready reference sections 136, 151, 153 & 155 of the Electricity act are reproduced below :
'Section 136. (Theft of electric lines and materials): --- (1) Whoever, dishonestly -
(a) cuts or removes or takes way or transfers any electric line, material or meter from a tower, pole, any other installation or place of installation or any other place, or site where it may be rightfully or lawfully stored, deposited, kept, stocked,
Essar Teleholdings Ltd. vs. Delhi High Court
Gangula Ashok vs. State of A.P. (2000) 2 SCC 504
Southern Power Distribution Co. of Telangana Ltd. vs. Mehdi Agah Karbalai : (2020) 11 SCC 704
The Special Court can take cognizance directly for offences under the Electricity Act and also under the Indian Penal Code, thereby avoiding the possibility of facing two trials by the accused for si....
The court upheld that cognizance of electricity theft offences can be taken on authorized complaints and clarified that the 2007 amendment allows police reports for cognizance, applicable retrospecti....
The Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act cannot take direct cognizance of offences under the IPC without prior committal by a Magistrate, aligning with the hierarchy of c....
The jurisdiction of the Special Judge and the sufficiency of grounds for proceeding against the accused were central to the court's decision.
Section 135 of 2003 Act deals with an offence of theft of electricity and penalty that can be imposed for such theft. This squarely falls within dimensions of criminal jurisprudence and mens rea is o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.