IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
Kamlesh And Ritesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.8479 of 2022
Decided On : 17-02-2022
Anticipatory Bail - Abetment of Suicide - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicants as it prima facie appeared that abetment of suicide could not be attributed to them, and custodial interrogation was deemed unnecessary.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants sought anticipatory bail as they were apprehending arrest in connection with a case of abetment of suicide of the deceased, who was allegedly harassed by the applicants and their father.
Finding of the Court:
The court, after considering the submissions and perusing the case diary, found that prima facie, it was not a case where abetment of suicide could be attributed to the applicants. Therefore, the application for anticipatory bail was allowed without commenting on the merits of the case.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of abetment of suicide.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that custodial interrogation of the applicants was unnecessary as it prima facie appeared that they were not involved in the abetment of suicide.
Final Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicants, directing them to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing surety, and to make themselves available for interrogation by the police officer as required.
JUDGMENT
Subodh abhayankar, J. - This is the applicants' first application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail, as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.137/2022 registered at Police Station -Bhawarkua, District-Indore (MP) for offence punishable under Sections under Sections 306, 34 of the IPC, 1860.
Allegation against the applicants is that the applicant No.1 is the real brother and the applicant No.2 is the step brother of the deceased Lokesh and it is alleged that they along with his father used to harass the deceased Lokesh which led him to commit suicide on 13.12.2021 by hanging.
Counsel for the applicant has submitted that on account of Lokesh (deceased) ill treatment of his father and other family members he was expelled from the house in the year 2017 and thereafter a paper publication has also been made in the year 2018 expelling him from his family and he was living separately with his wife and children since last around five years and recently he has again started to interfere in the family affairs of the applicants and was raising a property dispute. Counsel has submitted that although suicide note has been left by the deceased but that itself is not sufficient to hold that the applicants have abated the aforesaid offence in the absence of any cogent material on record. Thus, it is submitted that the application for anticipatory bail be allowed.
Counsel for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer, however it is submitted that the deceased was residing separately since 2017 and as the deceased has lost his job during the Covid times he wanted a roof in his father's house, which was denied as has been stated by the wife of the deceased.
Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the case diary, in considered opinion of this Court, prima-facie, it appears that it is not a case where abatement of suicide can be attributed to the present applicants. In such circumstances, the custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary. accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.
It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicants shall be released on bail, upon their executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) each and furnishing solvent surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer (Investigating Officer).
The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police Officer, as and when required. They shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in Sub Section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Certified copy, as per rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that demands for repayment of money, without evidence of instigation or mens rea, do not constitute abetment for suicide under Section 306 of the I....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in granting anticipatory bail based on the necessity of custodial interrogation and the willingness of the applicant to coop....
The absence of prima facie evidence of intention to abet suicide negates culpability, regardless of emotional pressures involved.
Anticipatory – High Court or Court of Session could grant limited anticipatory bail in the form of an interim protection under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (Section 438 of Cr.P.C.) in interest of justic....
The court emphasized that sending a person to jail should be the last resort and considered the parameters for grant of anticipatory bail, focusing on the nature and gravity of the accusation and the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.