SUJOY PAUL
Sunil Laddha – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujoy Paul, J.
1. With the consent, finally heard.
2. This is the second application filed by the applicants/accused under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No. 24/2020 registered at Police Station - GRP Line, District - Indore for the offences registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The previous application, M.Cr.C. No. 45468/2020 was dismissed on 19.11.2020 because it was arising out of an order of trial Court declining anticipatory bail at a time when even crime was not registered.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that for all practical purposes, this is first anticipatory bail application before this Court. The Court below erred in declining anticipatory bail by order dated 27.02.2021.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that as per prosecution story, deceased - Kailash committed suicide by leaving a suicide note wherein name of present applicants is mentioned. Reason assigned for suicide is non-payment of painting work by present applicants. By placing reliance on work agreement dated 01.08.2020 (Annexure-A/4), it is
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v/s. State (Government of Delhi)
Devendra & Others v/s. The State of U.P. & Another
Devendra Singh v/s. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Dilawar Balu Kurane v/s. The State of Maharashtra
Gangula Mohan Reddy v/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh
M. Mohan v/s. The State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Ramesh Kumar v/s. The State of Chhatisgarh
Sanju @ Sajay Singh Sengar v/s. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.