SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1601

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
Arun S/o Ramsingh Raghuwanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.6677 of 2022
Decided On : 08-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Gupta, Advocate, Sameer Verma, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of false implication and lack of evidence in granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Implication in Excise Offense - The court allowed the bail application, finding that the applicant's false implication cannot be ruled out at this stage, and directed the release of the applicant on bail with certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, in connection with an offense under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915. The applicant was alleged to be involved in the case where unauthorized liquor was seized from a vehicle, but claimed to be a victim rather than an accused.

Finding of the Court:

The court found force with the contentions raised by the applicant's counsel, indicating that the applicant's false implication cannot be ruled out at this stage, and allowed the bail application with certain conditions.

Issues: The issues involved the alleged false implication of the applicant in the excise offense and the request for bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence supporting the applicant's involvement in the offense and the contention that the applicant was a victim rather than an accused.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail with certain conditions, while making it clear that any further criminal activity by the applicant would result in the cancellation of the bail order.

JUDGMENT

Subodh abhyankar, J. - This is the applicant's first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. He is implicated in connection with Crime No.75/2019 registered at Police Station Sagaur, District Dhar (MP) for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Excise act, 1915.

The applicant is in jail since 20.01.2022.

The allegation against the applicant is that he was involved in the aforesaid case wherein 324 bulk liters of unauthorized liquor has been seized from Bolero Vehicle on 16.03.2019.

Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case, as he was not involved in the aforesaid offence as an accused, but as a victim; and according to the information received, he met with an accident with the Bolero Vehicle and was also taken to the hospital through 108 ambulance, which is also apparent from the case diary.

It is further submitted that the applicant was never absconding and was, in fact, initially admitted to the hospital and thereafter was residing in his village only and has been arrested only on 20.01.2022 with a view to fix the responsibility.

Thus, it is submitted that the applicant be released on bail. Learned counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and it is submitted that the applicant was found to be sitting in the Bolero Vehicle which met with an accident. However, on a query made by this Court, if there are any blood stained and spots in the Bolero Vehicle, counsel has answered in negative.

Even in his memo prepared under Section 27 of the Evidence act, he has not mentioned that he was taken to hospital from the spot.

In such circumstances, this Court finds force with the contentions raised by the learned cousnel for the applicant and his false implication cannot be ruled out, at this stage.

In view of the same, the application deserves to be allowed. accordingly, the present application for grant of bail is hereby allowed, without commenting anything on the merits of the matter. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed. The applicant shall be abide by the conditions as enumerated under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

It is made clear that, after being released on bail, if the applicant again indulges himself in any criminal activity, the present bail order shall stand cancelled without further reference to the Court and the police shall be entitled to arrest the applicant in the present case also.

This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top