SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1620

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh Station – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Saraswat, Advocate, Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, Neelesh Dave, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. - Shri abhay Saraswat, learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri Mukesh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent/State.

Shri NJ Dave, learned counsel for the Objector.

This is first application for temporary bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant in connection with Crime No.65/2020 registered at Police Station Rajod, Dist. Dhar (M.P.) under Sections 302 , 307, 147, 148, 149, 323 of IPC and S. 25-B of ARMS ACT on the ground of death of mother of applicants namely-Chandabai.

It is stated that trial court had permitted the applicants to attend the funeral of the mother in police custody. It is submitted that last rites of their mother are to be performed tomorrow, therefore the applicants be released on temporary bail for attending the same.

Considering the order of the trial court that the factum of death and Shok Patrika, it is established that mother of applicants-Chandabai has died on 25.1.2022, I am of the view that applicants are entitled for grant of temporary bail to attend the last rites of their mother till 14.02.2022.

Consequently, it is directed that the applicants be released on bail temporarily till 14.2.2022 on fu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top