SANJAY DWIVEDI
Sunil Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner has invoked two different provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure by filing these ill-assorted petitions inasmuch as Miscellaneous Criminal Case (M.Cr.C. No.14139/2021) has been filed under Section 482 of the Code for quashing the charge-sheet filed against him vis-a vis Crime No.196/2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Budhni, District Sehore and Criminal Revision (Cr.R. No.1678/2021) has been filed under Section 394/401 of the CrPC against the order dated 19.02.2021 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Budhni, District Sehore, in Sessions Trial No.152/2019 arising out of same crime number whereby charge under Section 302/120-B of the IPC has been framed against the petitioner.
2. The main thrust of challenge in both the petitions is based on a ground of fallaciously implication of the petitioner by unnecessarily roping him in the crime. As per the petitioner, his induction in the crime is solely ill-founded as on the basis of material available on record, offence under Sections 302 and 120-B of the IPC is not made out against him.
In the circumstance, the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.