IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Shravan Kumar Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.4479 of 2022
Decided On : 27-01-2022
Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case involving offenses punishable under Sections 307, 323, 294, and 506/34 of the IPC. The court considered the age of the applicant and the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries, and allowed the application without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving offenses under Sections 307, 323, 294, and 506/34 of the IPC. The main accused was the son of the applicant, and the applicant was falsely implicated in a criminal case arising from a land dispute.
Finding of the Court:
The court, after considering the arguments of both parties, found that the ingredients of Section 307 of the IPC were not made out against the applicant. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the court allowed the application and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Issues: The issues involved the alleged false implication of the applicant in a criminal case arising from a land dispute, the age of the applicant, and the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries, and the finding that the ingredients of Section 307 of the IPC were not made out against the applicant.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed that the applicant be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail, subject to surrendering before the investigating officer within 15 days and complying with the specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Vivek agarwal, J. - This is first application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail who is apprehending his arrest in connection with case Crime No.361/2021 registered at Police Station Badi, District Raisen (M.P.) for offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 294 and 506/34 of I.P.C.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is aged about 79 years as is reflected from his Election ID Card in which year of birth is shown as 1943.
It is submitted that main accused is Mahendra Singh Chouhan who is son of the present applicant, against whom there are allegations of causing injuries on the head of Shalabh Shrivastava whereas applicant has been falsely implicated with a view to implicate all the male members of the family. It is submitted that looking to the age of the present applicant it is not possible to cause such kind of flows as have been attributed to him.
It is further submitted that in fact a land dispute has been converted into a criminal case with a view to extract advantage. In fact, wife of the present applicant who was abused and beaten for which she lodged FIR registering case Crime No.0363/2021 under Sections 294, 323, 506 and 34 of IPC in which the present applicant Rajesh Shrivastava is an accused.
It is submitted that looking to the age of the applicant and also the fact that there are omnibus allegations and further allegation on him is to cause injury on the body of Rajesh Shrivastava which are simple in nature and there is neither any query report nor any X-ray report to substantiate that injuries were grievous in nature. Trial will take time to conclude, hence prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Learned Panel Lawyer in his turn opposes the bail application and prays for rejection of anticipatory bail.
after hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration a fact that ingredients of 307 of IPC are not made out against the present applicant. accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.
It is directed that applicant- Shravan Kumar Chouhan is extended benefit of anticipatory bail, subject to applicant surrendering before the I.O. within 15 days' from today and in case he surrenders before the I.O. then I.O. shall let him on bail after accepting personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer for his appearance before the concerned Police Station within 15 days' from today and on all dates and for complying with the conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Certified copy as per rules.
The court considered the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries and the finding that the ingredients of Section 307 of the IPC were not made out against the applicant ....
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on factors such as the age of the applicant and the lack of overt act in the alleged offence.
The court may grant anticipatory bail after considering the seriousness of the charge, the applicant's cooperation in the investigation, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case.
Anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. when the petitioner demonstrates a lack of criminal history and the circumstances do not warrant immediate arrest.
The court considered the nature of injuries, the pending civil dispute, and the failure of the Investigating Officer to issue notice under section 41a Cr.P.C in reaching its decision on the anticipat....
The court held anticipatory bail application maintainable as penal provisions added post-incident cannot retrospectively deny rights, but the serious nature of the allegations warranted denial of bai....
The court's decision to grant anticipatory bail was influenced by the absence of misuse of bail, the undertaking of the applicant, and the specific conditions imposed for the grant of anticipatory ba....
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the circumstances of the case, including the status of co-accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.