SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1452

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, J.
Shravan Kumar Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.4479 of 2022
Decided On : 27-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Kapil Sharma, Advocate, Shravan Kumar Chouhan, Advocate, Kishor Singh Chouhan, Advocate, Dinesh Prasad Patel, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court considered the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries and the finding that the ingredients of Section 307 of the IPC were not made out against the applicant in granting anticipatory bail.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case involving offenses punishable under Sections 307, 323, 294, and 506/34 of the IPC. The court considered the age of the applicant and the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries, and allowed the application without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving offenses under Sections 307, 323, 294, and 506/34 of the IPC. The main accused was the son of the applicant, and the applicant was falsely implicated in a criminal case arising from a land dispute.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after considering the arguments of both parties, found that the ingredients of Section 307 of the IPC were not made out against the applicant. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the court allowed the application and granted anticipatory bail to the applicant.

Issues: The issues involved the alleged false implication of the applicant in a criminal case arising from a land dispute, the age of the applicant, and the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence supporting the serious nature of the alleged injuries, and the finding that the ingredients of Section 307 of the IPC were not made out against the applicant.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed that the applicant be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail, subject to surrendering before the investigating officer within 15 days and complying with the specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Vivek agarwal, J. - This is first application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail who is apprehending his arrest in connection with case Crime No.361/2021 registered at Police Station Badi, District Raisen (M.P.) for offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 294 and 506/34 of I.P.C.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is aged about 79 years as is reflected from his Election ID Card in which year of birth is shown as 1943.

It is submitted that main accused is Mahendra Singh Chouhan who is son of the present applicant, against whom there are allegations of causing injuries on the head of Shalabh Shrivastava whereas applicant has been falsely implicated with a view to implicate all the male members of the family. It is submitted that looking to the age of the present applicant it is not possible to cause such kind of flows as have been attributed to him.

It is further submitted that in fact a land dispute has been converted into a criminal case with a view to extract advantage. In fact, wife of the present applicant who was abused and beaten for which she lodged FIR registering case Crime No.0363/2021 under Sections 294, 323, 506 and 34 of IPC in which the present applicant Rajesh Shrivastava is an accused.

It is submitted that looking to the age of the applicant and also the fact that there are omnibus allegations and further allegation on him is to cause injury on the body of Rajesh Shrivastava which are simple in nature and there is neither any query report nor any X-ray report to substantiate that injuries were grievous in nature. Trial will take time to conclude, hence prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer in his turn opposes the bail application and prays for rejection of anticipatory bail.

after hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration a fact that ingredients of 307 of IPC are not made out against the present applicant. accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant- Shravan Kumar Chouhan is extended benefit of anticipatory bail, subject to applicant surrendering before the I.O. within 15 days' from today and in case he surrenders before the I.O. then I.O. shall let him on bail after accepting personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer for his appearance before the concerned Police Station within 15 days' from today and on all dates and for complying with the conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top