SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1402

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
G.S. Ahluwalia, J.
Veeramchand – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.4213 of 2022
Decided On : 25-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
S.S. Rajput, Advocate, Rajeev Upadhyay, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Bail Application - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon depositing a specified amount in the court registry and furnishing cash surety or title deeds of immovable property. The court also imposed conditions related to appearance before the Trial Court and forfeiture of surety in case of default.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested for an offence under Sections 8/20, 29 of NDPS act for the seizure of 21 Kgs. of Ganja from the truck of the applicant. The applicant claimed that three other persons were responsible for the Ganja and that he was not involved in the offence. The applicant sought bail on the grounds of readiness to abide by stringent conditions and contribute to fighting against the Covid-19 pandemic.

Finding of the Court:

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon fulfilling specified conditions.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with an offence under the NDPS act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the readiness of the applicant to abide by stringent conditions, contribute to fighting against the Covid-19 pandemic, and the likelihood of the trial taking a long time and no possibility of absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon fulfilling specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

G.S. ahluwalia, J. - This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 30.10.2021 in connection with Crime No.798/2021 registered at Police Station Kotwali Guna, District Guna for offence under Sections 8/20, 29 of NDPS act.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution case, 21 Kgs. of Ganja was seized from the truck of the applicant. It is submitted that in fact, three persons had taken lift from the applicant and they were carrying 21 Kgs. of Ganja. The applicant is not involved in commission of offence. However, in view of the allegations that those three persons had already informed the applicant about the fact that they are carrying Ganja and in view that that he is ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition which may be imposed by the Court including that of furnishing cash surety. Further, in the wake of ongoing Covid-19 pandemic he is ready and willing to contribute in monetary form for fighting against Covid-19 pandemic. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.

Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the counsel for the State.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail in case he deposits an amount of Rs.15,000/- in the Registry of this Court, which shall be utilized for upgrading the Civil Dispensary functioning within the Court premises, and on furnishing cash surety of Rs.2,00,000 (Rs. Two Lacs) or in the alternative on depositing his original title-deed(s) [not Rin Pustika] of the immovable property worth of more than the said amount, as directed by the Supreme Court in the case of Sharo @ Shahrukh vs. The State of M.P. by order dated 6.9.2021 passed in SLP (Cri.) No.6321/2021 to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

It is made clear that single default in appearance before the Trial Court, or in case of registration of new offence, this bail order shall automatically come to an end and the cash surety so furnished by the applicant shall automatically stand forfeited without any reference to the Court. In case, if title deeds are deposited, then the same shall not be returned unless and until surety amount is deposited.

This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18.3.2021 in Criminal appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top