SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1490

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.
Shaitan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64567 of 2021
Decided On : 04-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Dhirendra Singh, Advocate, Sangam Jain, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 of CrPC, considering the circumstances and without commenting on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439 of CrPC, considering the arguments of the applicant's counsel and without commenting on the merits of the case. The applicant was directed to comply with various conditions, including cooperating in the investigation/trial and not committing any offence.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested for an offence under Section 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. act in connection with the recovery of ganja from his possession. The applicant sought bail, claiming the recovery allegation was false and expressing concern over the lengthy investigation and trial process.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, directing the applicant to furnish a personal bond and surety, and comply with specified conditions. The court did not comment on the merits of the case but considered the arguments of the applicant's counsel.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 of CrPC for an offence under the N.D.P.S. act, concern over lengthy investigation and trial process, and the truthfulness of the recovery allegation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail to the applicant without commenting on the merits of the case, considering the concerns raised by the applicant's counsel and imposing specific conditions to ensure the applicant's compliance with the law.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was directed to comply with specified conditions, including cooperating in the investigation/trial and not committing any offence.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - This is first application under Section 439 of CrPC for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 11/12/2021 in connection with Crime No.1055/2021 registered at Police Station Cantt. Guna, District Guna for offence under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. act.

It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant Shaitan Singh that the allegation of recovery of 2 kg and 720 gm of ganja from the possession of the applicant is false. He has not committed any offence. He is in jail since last almost one month. Investigation and thereafter trial will take long time to conclude. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposed the bail application and prayed to reject the same.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the materials available on record.

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is hereby directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court for his regular appearance before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him/her;

2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3 . The applicant will not indulge herself/himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. The applicant shall not commit any offence otherwise this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled;

5 . The applicant will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and

7 . The applicant shall mark his presence before the SHO of the concerning police station once in a fortnight (every 15 days) during the pendency of the trial.

application stands allowed and disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top