SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1428

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Babulal Ahirwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.2974 of 2022
Decided On : 19-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, Anil Shukla, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances of the case and completion of investigation and charge sheet filing.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offence under Sections 294, 323, 324, 34, 506, 325, 326 of IPC - The court allowed the bail application based on the circumstances of the case and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bail bond.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. after being arrested for offences under Sections 294, 323, 324, 34, 506, 325, 326 of IPC. The prosecution alleged that the applicant and others were involved in assaulting and causing injuries to the complainant and others.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without commenting on the merits of the case, allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the allegations and circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the circumstances of the case and the completion of investigation and charge sheet filing, and decided to grant bail to the applicant.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with one solvent surety.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Kumar agarwal, J. - This is the First bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

The applicant was arrested on 27.12.2021 in connection with Crime No.222/2021 by Police Station Gulabganj, District Vidisha (MP) for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 324, 34, 506, 325, 326 of IPC.

As per prosecution story, on 25.10.2021 at 7.30 pm complainant Brijesh lodged a report at Government Hospital, Gulabganj, against present applicant and three others alleging that by driving in his tractor-trolley on his plot, applicant Babulal broke his Bagad (boundary). When the complainant objected, he started abusing him with filthy language. Thereafter from the trolley he took out an axe and assaulted on his head, due to which blood came out. To save the complainant, Bheem Raghuwanshi and anil Raghuwanshi came, then Chokidar Veeran carrying Farsa, Kannu ahirwar sickle and elder brother of Veeran Chokidar armed with Lathi came there and started beating them. Veeran assaulted with Farsa on the head of anil, Kannu assaulted with sickle on left hand of anil and elder brother of Veeran inflicted Danda blow on the head of Bheem. at that juncture, Chhotu Maharaj and Vishnu Raghuwanshi came and rescued them. On his report, Dehati Nalishi was recorded. Thereafter vide crime No.222/2021 offence under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506, 34 of IPC was registered. Injured Brajesh, anil and Bheem were sent for medical examination. Bheem sustained grievous injury as one depressed fracture was found on skull bone. Hence, offence under Sections 325, 326 of IPC was enhanced. applicant/accused was arrested on 27.12.2021. after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the offence. He is in custody since 27.12.2021. a cross-case has been registered against the complainant party under Sections 323, 294, 506, 34 of IPC and allegation of causing injury to injured Bheem is not against the applicant. Investigation has been complete and charge sheet has been filed. Conclusion of trial will take time. On such premises, learned counsel for the applicant prayed for bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Looking to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the application should be allowed and by allowing the application it is ordered that if the applicant furnishes bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, he should be released on bail.

He will present during trial before the trial Court on each and every date.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top