IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J.
Keshav Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 14617 of 2023
Decided On : 10-04-2023
Bail Application - Offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 294, 506, 336, 302 of IPC - The court allowed the bail application based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, and ordered the applicant to be released on bail upon furnishing cash surety and bail bond.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested in connection with a crime involving multiple offences under the IPC, including the death of an individual due to assault. The applicant filed a bail application, claiming innocence and false implication.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without commenting on the merits of the case, allowed the bail application based on the facts and circumstances, ordering the release of the applicant on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of bail to the applicant who was arrested for serious offences under the IPC, including the death of an individual due to assault.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and decided to grant bail to the applicant, emphasizing the need for the applicant to fulfill certain conditions for release.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail upon fulfilling specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
Deepak Kumar Agarwal, J. - This is fifth bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of bail. Earlier four applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Applicant has been arrested on 14.02.2022 by police Station, Vijaypur, Distt. Sheopur, in connection with crime No.26/2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 294, 506, 336, 302 of IPC.
3. Prosecution case in brief is that on 13.2.2022 at 3.15 pm complainant Surendra Yadav lodged a Dehati Nalishi with police Sub-Inspector J.P.Parashar at CHC, Vijaypur, against present applicant Keshav Yadav and 17 others alleging that in the afternoon at 12.30 pm he was at door of his house, at that juncture, co-accused Deepu along with aforesaid co-accused armed with Farsa, axe, Lathi and gun came there and started abusing him. Thereafter accused Roopsingh fired in the air and applicant/accused Keshav assaulted with axe on the head of his brother Bharat. Thereafter applicant/accused Keshav also inflicted two more blows of axe to Bharat. When to save Bharat, Leeladhar, Urmila, Sunita, Maya and Mitt came, then Kallu @ Kalyan Yadav assaulted with Farsa on the head of Leeladhar, Nirmal assaulted with Lathi on the leg and back of Leeladhar, Kheru @ Raghuveer Yadav assaulted with Farsa on the head of mother Mitti, Uttam and Koksingh assaulted with axe on the head of mother Mitti, Phoolsingh assaulted with blunt side of Farsa on the face of Urmila and Atar Singh with blunt side of axe and accused Deepu with Lathi assaulted on leg and back. Prahlad Yadav, Dhaniram Yadav, Ramdayal Yadav assaulted with Lathi and axe on waist, leg and back of Sunita. Keshav, Bhanu Yadav, Lokman Yadav assaulted with Farsa and Lathi on Maya, due to which she received various injuries on her person. Rinku and Udaybhan assaulted with axe at right hand and waist of complainant. They brought mother Mitti to Vijaypur hospital, from where she was referred to Gwalior and on the way to Gwalior she died. On his report, Dehati Nalishi for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 294, 506, 336, 302 of IPC was recorded. Thereafter FIR crime No.26/2022 and Merg No.32/2022 was recorded. Dead-body Panchnama was prepared. Dead-body was sent for postmortem. Injured were medically examined. As per postmortem report, Mitti died due to head injury. Injured Urmila got fracture in left fibula bone. Applicant was arrested on 6.5.2022. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since14.02.2022. Investigation has been complete and charge-sheet has been filed. It is further submitted that deceased Mitti died due to assault of Raghuveer, Uttam and Koksingh. On the same day, one FIR bearing crime No.28/2022 was lodged by accused persons against injured persons for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 294, 506, 336 of IPC in which later on, offences under Sections 325 and 326 of IPC were enhanced. Co-accused Deepu @ Ramvilas has been granted bail vide order dated 22.02.2023 passed in M.Cr.C. No.8766/2023. He undertakes to cooperate in trial. Conclusion of trial will take time. On such premises, learned counsel for the applicant prayed for bail.
5. Learned counsel for the State as well as complainant opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.
6. Both the Advocates are heard. Case diary perused.
7. Looking to the facts & circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the application should be allowed and by allowing the application it is ordered that if the applicant furnishes cash surety of Rs.25,000/- alongwith bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, he should be released on bail.
8. He will present during trial before the trial Court on each and ever
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, even for serious offenses, upon imposing suitable conditions to ensure the presence of the accused during ....
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances of the case and completion of investigation and charge sheet filing.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without delving into the merits of the case, and may impose conditions to ensure the accused's presence du....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the assessment of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision was influenced by the consideration of the likelihood of the applicant's absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence, and the specific conditions imposed for granting b....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the facts and circumstances of the case, emphasizing the need for the applicant to cooperate in trial and appear before the trial court on each date.
The court may grant bail considering the circumstances of the case, the filing of the charge sheet, and the time it would take for the conclusion of the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.