SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1410

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Tej Singh Badgujar, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No.184/2021, Police Station Nawa, District Nagaur for the offences punishable under Sections 354 & 452 of IPC.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet in the case has been filed. He submits that petitioner is facing incarceration for almost two and a half months. The conclusion of trial will take sufficient long time, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6. Consequently, the present bail application filed under Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top